Literature DB >> 16112635

High and low density in the same bone: a study on children and adolescents with mild osteogenesis imperfecta.

Frank Rauch1, Christof Land, Sylvie Cornibert, Eckhard Schoenau, Francis H Glorieux.   

Abstract

Children and adolescents with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) generally have low bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and hip. However, the effects of the disease on diaphyseal bone have not been well characterized, even though long-bone fractures are common in such patients. In this study on 42 fully mobile children and adolescents with mild OI (age 6-19 years; 17 girls), lumbar spine, radius (metaphysis and diaphysis) and second metacarpal (diaphysis) were analyzed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, peripheral quantitative computed tomography and radiogrammetry, respectively. Bone mineral content at the lumbar spine, radial metaphysis and radial diaphysis was between 25% and 31% lower than in age-matched healthy children and adolescents. At the lumbar spine and radial metaphysis, bone size (as estimated from projection area and cross-sectional area, respectively) was normal or only slightly below the results expected for healthy individuals, whereas bone size was very small at the diaphyseal sites of the radius and the second metacarpal. Total volumetric BMD is defined as the ratio between bone mineral content and bone volume. Therefore, these differences in bone size between skeletal locations led to markedly discrepant results for total volumetric BMD. Total volumetric BMD was low at the lumbar spine (23% below result expected for healthy subjects of the same age) and the radial metaphysis (-15%) but elevated at the radial diaphysis (+25%; all differences to controls significant at P < 0.001). Despite high volumetric BMD, estimated bending strength at the radial diaphysis was very low. These results demonstrate that volumetric BMD can be abnormally high and low within the same bone in the same individual and highlight the fact that volumetric BMD at diaphyseal sites does not provide a good estimate of bone strength when bone size is abnormal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16112635     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  9 in total

1.  Finite element analysis of bone strength in osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Peter Varga; Bettina M Willie; Chris Stephan; Kenneth M Kozloff; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  Osteogenesis imperfecta in children and adolescents-new developments in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  P Trejo; F Rauch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Bone mass and mineralization in osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Nadja Fratzl-Zelman; Barbara M Misof; Klaus Klaushofer; Paul Roschger
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2015-07-25

4.  Gene mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlation in a cohort of Chinese osteogenesis imperfecta patients revealed by targeted next generation sequencing.

Authors:  Y Liu; D Ma; F Lv; X Xu; J Wang; W Xia; Y Jiang; O Wang; X Xing; W Yu; J Wang; J Sun; L Song; Y Zhu; H Yang; J Wang; M Li
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Dental panoramic indices and fractal dimension measurements in osteogenesis imperfecta children under pamidronate treatment.

Authors:  Ana C Apolinário; Rafael Sindeaux; Paulo T de Souza Figueiredo; Ana T B Guimarães; Ana C Acevedo; Luiz C Castro; Ana P de Paula; Lilian M de Paula; Nilce S de Melo; André F Leite
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  A reference database for the Stratec XCT-2000 peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) scanner in healthy children and young adults aged 6-19 years.

Authors:  R L Ashby; K A Ward; S A Roberts; L Edwards; M Z Mughal; J E Adams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Femoral geometric parameters and BMD measurements by DXA in adult patients with different types of osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Roland Kocijan; Christian Muschitz; Nadja Fratzl-Zelman; Judith Haschka; Hans-Peter Dimai; Angela Trubrich; Christina Bittighofer; Heinrich Resch
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Comprehensive genetic analyses using targeted next-generation sequencing and genotype-phenotype correlations in 53 Japanese patients with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Y Ohata; S Takeyari; Y Nakano; T Kitaoka; H Nakayama; V Bizaoui; K Yamamoto; K Miyata; K Yamamoto; M Fujiwara; T Kubota; T Michigami; K Yamamoto; T Yamamoto; N Namba; K Ebina; H Yoshikawa; K Ozono
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Assessment of longitudinal bone growth in osteogenesis imperfecta using metacarpophalangeal pattern profiles.

Authors:  Damian Rauch; Marie-Eve Robinson; Cristian Seiltgens; V Reid Sutton; Brendan Lee; Francis Glorieux; Frank Rauch
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.398

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.