S Loughran1, N Tennant, A Kishore, I R C Swan. 1. Medical Research Council, Institute of Hearing Research, Scottish Section, Glasgow, UK. sean@ihr.gla.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the interobserver reliability in assessing postural stability and to compare with results obtained by computerized posturography. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Balance clinic, teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 81 patients attending with a primary complaint of imbalance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inter-rater reliability between two clinicians and the modified Clinical Test for the Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB) as assessed by the Neurocom VSR Balance Master platform. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability scores were high (0.53-0.81) for all conditions of the mCTSIB except for the easiest, i.e. firm surface eyes open, where concordance levels were poor to fair. CONCLUSIONS: Overall there was good agreement between observers and the computerized mCTSIB.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the interobserver reliability in assessing postural stability and to compare with results obtained by computerized posturography. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Balance clinic, teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 81 patients attending with a primary complaint of imbalance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inter-rater reliability between two clinicians and the modified Clinical Test for the Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB) as assessed by the Neurocom VSR Balance Master platform. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability scores were high (0.53-0.81) for all conditions of the mCTSIB except for the easiest, i.e. firm surface eyes open, where concordance levels were poor to fair. CONCLUSIONS: Overall there was good agreement between observers and the computerized mCTSIB.
Authors: Mônica S V Tomomitsu; Angelica Castilho Alonso; Eurica Morimoto; Tatiana G Bobbio; Julia M D Greve Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.365