Literature DB >> 16111420

Three-year follow-up of children with postmeningitic deafness and partial cochlear implant insertion.

L J C Rotteveel1, Ad F M Snik, A M Vermeulen, E A M Mylanus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term outcome of children with postmeningitic deafness and partial insertion of the Nucleus electrode array, and to compare their speech perception performance with that of children with full insertion of the electrode array.
DESIGN: A battery of seven speech perception tests was administered to 25 children with a cochlear implant (CI). Results were reduced into one score: equivalent hearing loss (EHL).
SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. PARTICIPANTS: The partial insertion group comprised seven children, mean age at implantation 5.5 years, mean duration of deafness 3.6 years. The full-insertion control group comprised 18 children. Mean age at implantation: 4.4 years; mean duration of deafness: 2.9 years. All the children became deaf between 0 and 3 years of age. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Over a 3-year follow-up period, the children with partial insertion showed continuing progress, although there was wide variation in performance and the rate of progression. Some open-set comprehension could even be achieved with the insertion of only eight electrodes of a nucleus device.
RESULTS: Three years after implantation, speech perception in the partial insertion children was poorer than that in the control groups with long (P < 0.01; 95% confidence interval 7-43 dB EHL) and short duration of deafness (P < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval 28-53 dB EHL). They showed slower progress and reached a poorer EHL plateau. Four of the seven children acquired open-set word recognition.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with partial insertion of the electrode array benefit from a CI, although less than patients with complete insertion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16111420     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2005.00958.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1749-4478            Impact factor:   2.597


  8 in total

Review 1.  The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Chelsea Bates; Michael S Harris; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Post-Meningitis Deafness: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Authors:  Kaajal Singhal; Juhi Singhal; Jameel Muzaffar; Peter Monksfield; Manohar Bance
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.017

3.  Outcome of cochlear implantation in post-meningitis deaf children.

Authors:  Mahdiyeh Hasanalifard; Mohammad Ajalloueyan; Susan Amirsalari; Amin Saburi
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 0.611

4.  Cochlear implantation after bacterial meningitis in infants younger than 9 months.

Authors:  B Y Roukema; M C Van Loon; C Smits; C F Smit; S T Goverts; P Merkus; E F Hensen
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-20

5.  American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force Guidelines for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Children.

Authors:  Andrea D Warner-Czyz; J Thomas Roland; Denise Thomas; Kristin Uhler; Lindsay Zombek
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  Management of Severe Facial Nerve Cross Stimulation by Cochlear Implant Replacement to Change Pulse Shape and Grounding Configuration: A Case-series.

Authors:  Susan T Eitutis; Robert P Carlyon; Yu Chuen Tam; Marina Salorio-Corbetto; Zebunnisa Vanat; Karen Tebbutt; Rhian Bardsley; Harry R F Powell; Shibasis Chowdhury; James R Tysome; Manohar L Bance
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Surgical Methods and Auditory Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Cochlear Ossification.

Authors:  Taskin Tokat; Tolgahan Catli; Ergul Basaran Bozkurt; Levent Olgun
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with meningitis induced hearing loss.

Authors:  J Beijen; J Casselman; F Joosten; T Stover; A Aschendorff; A Zarowski; H Becker; E Mylanus
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.503

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.