PURPOSE: Comprehensive care of vascular patients includes attention to atherosclerotic risk factor management. We surveyed members of the Midwestern Vascular Surgical Society (MVSS) with the following objectives: (1) to determine the usual practice pattern with respect to risk factor inquiry, screening, and intervention, (2) to determine which risk factors vascular surgeons believe are important for patients with peripheral arterial disease, and (3) to determine the vascular surgeon's confidence for management of each risk factor. METHODS: A survey was mailed to all MVSS members and two additional notifications were sent for initial nonresponders. Data regarding practice environment and local resources available to each surgeon were recorded. Questions were designed to determine the prevalence of risk factor inquiry and screening, grading of the importance of each risk factor, and the vascular surgeon's confidence in the management of each risk factor. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 219 (56%) of 391 of MVSS members. The average age of the responders was 53.1 +/- 9.3 years, and 94.1% were men. Seventy-four percent of the surgeons dedicate 90% to 100% of their time to vascular surgery, and 89% dedicate more than 50%. Seventy-seven percent of responders work in a private institution and 23% in a public hospital. The surgeon's practice had a full- or part-time affiliation with a medical school in 62% and was entirely community-based in 38%. A high proportion of surgeons inquire about each risk factor, but only a minority performs the actual screening of the risk factors, with the exception of hypertension. Diabetes mellitus and smoking were believed to be very important risk factors, hypertension and lipids of moderate importance, and exercise and activity, nutrition, and homocysteine level of low importance. The surgeons' confidence in risk factor management was low to moderate for most risk factors, but high for smoking and exercise. Despite these responses, only 10% of vascular surgeons thought that they should be primarily responsible for risk factor management. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgeons must provide a comprehensive approach to risk factor management for their patients. This can be conducted through the establishment of multidisciplinary risk factor programs or by the surgeon in certain cases when outside resources are not available. Risk factor management must be emphasized in vascular continuing medical education programs to enable surgeons to be confident with management.
PURPOSE: Comprehensive care of vascular patients includes attention to atherosclerotic risk factor management. We surveyed members of the Midwestern Vascular Surgical Society (MVSS) with the following objectives: (1) to determine the usual practice pattern with respect to risk factor inquiry, screening, and intervention, (2) to determine which risk factors vascular surgeons believe are important for patients with peripheral arterial disease, and (3) to determine the vascular surgeon's confidence for management of each risk factor. METHODS: A survey was mailed to all MVSS members and two additional notifications were sent for initial nonresponders. Data regarding practice environment and local resources available to each surgeon were recorded. Questions were designed to determine the prevalence of risk factor inquiry and screening, grading of the importance of each risk factor, and the vascular surgeon's confidence in the management of each risk factor. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 219 (56%) of 391 of MVSS members. The average age of the responders was 53.1 +/- 9.3 years, and 94.1% were men. Seventy-four percent of the surgeons dedicate 90% to 100% of their time to vascular surgery, and 89% dedicate more than 50%. Seventy-seven percent of responders work in a private institution and 23% in a public hospital. The surgeon's practice had a full- or part-time affiliation with a medical school in 62% and was entirely community-based in 38%. A high proportion of surgeons inquire about each risk factor, but only a minority performs the actual screening of the risk factors, with the exception of hypertension. Diabetes mellitus and smoking were believed to be very important risk factors, hypertension and lipids of moderate importance, and exercise and activity, nutrition, and homocysteine level of low importance. The surgeons' confidence in risk factor management was low to moderate for most risk factors, but high for smoking and exercise. Despite these responses, only 10% of vascular surgeons thought that they should be primarily responsible for risk factor management. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgeons must provide a comprehensive approach to risk factor management for their patients. This can be conducted through the establishment of multidisciplinary risk factor programs or by the surgeon in certain cases when outside resources are not available. Risk factor management must be emphasized in vascular continuing medical education programs to enable surgeons to be confident with management.
Authors: Karina Newhall; Bjoern Suckow; Emily Spangler; Benjamin S Brooke; Andres Schanzer; Tze-Woei Tan; Mary Burnette; Maria Orlando Edelen; Alik Farber; Philip Goodney Journal: Ann Vasc Surg Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 1.466