Literature DB >> 1611029

Different roles of flocculus and ventral paraflocculus for oculomotor control in the primate.

S Nagao1.   

Abstract

Responses of Purkinje cells were compared in the monkey flocculus and ventral paraflocculus. During vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) eye movements, flocculus Purkinje cells exhibited simple spike modulation related to head velocity, while ventral paraflocculus Purkinje cells exhibited modulation with no such head velocity preference. During smooth tracking of a sinusoidally moving small target, ventral paraflocculus Purkinje cells exhibited simple spike modulation related to target velocity or position, while the flocculus Purkinje cells exhibited a smaller modulation with no such target preference. Visual suppression of the VOR enhanced the simple spike responses in the ventral paraflocculus, but not in the flocculus. These results suggest that the primate flocculus and the ventral paraflocculus control differentially VOR and smooth pursuit eye movements, respectively.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1611029     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199201000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  14 in total

1.  Adaptive feedback control models of the vestibulocerebellum and spinocerebellum.

Authors:  H Gomi; M Kawato
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Role of granule-cell transmission in memory trace of cerebellum-dependent optokinetic motor learning.

Authors:  Norio Wada; Kazuo Funabiki; Shigetada Nakanishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Tinnitus and hyperacusis: Contributions of paraflocculus, reticular formation and stress.

Authors:  Yu-Chen Chen; Guang-Di Chen; Benjamin D Auerbach; Senthilvelan Manohar; Kelly Radziwon; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Role of Purkinje cells in the ventral paraflocculus in short-latency ocular following responses.

Authors:  M Shidara; K Kawano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Subcortical input to the smooth and saccadic eye movement subregions of the frontal eye field in Cebus monkey.

Authors:  J C Lynch
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Saccade and vestibular ocular motor adaptation.

Authors:  Michael C Schubert; David S Zee
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  Dynamic characteristics and adaptability of mouse vestibulo-ocular and optokinetic response eye movements and the role of the flocculo-olivary system revealed by chemical lesions.

Authors:  A Katoh; H Kitazawa; S Itohara; S Nagao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-06-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Internal models of eye movement in the floccular complex of the monkey cerebellum.

Authors:  S G Lisberger
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-03-29       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Partial ablations of the flocculus and ventral paraflocculus in monkeys cause linked deficits in smooth pursuit eye movements and adaptive modification of the VOR.

Authors:  H Rambold; A Churchland; Y Selig; L Jasmin; S G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Cerebellar zones: a personal history.

Authors:  Jan Voogd
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.