Literature DB >> 16109963

The N-terminal domain of enterococcal surface protein, Esp, is sufficient for Esp-mediated biofilm enhancement in Enterococcus faecalis.

Preeti M Tendolkar1, Arto S Baghdayan, Nathan Shankar.   

Abstract

Enterococci have emerged as one of the leading causes of nosocomial bloodstream, surgical site, and urinary tract infections. More recently, enterococci have been associated with biofilms, which are bacterial communities attached to a surface and encased in an extracellular polymeric matrix. The enterococcal cell surface-associated protein, Esp, enhances biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis in a glucose-dependent manner. Mature Esp consists of a nonrepeat N-terminal domain and a central region made up of two types of tandem repeats followed by a C-terminal membrane-spanning and anchor domain. This study was undertaken to localize the specific domain(s) of Esp that plays a role in Esp-mediated biofilm enhancement. To achieve this objective, we constructed in-frame deletion mutants expressing truncated forms of Esp in an isogenic background. By comparing strains expressing the mutant forms of Esp to those expressing wild-type Esp, we found that the strain expressing Esp lacking the N-terminal domain formed biofilms that were quantitatively less in biovolume than the strain expressing wild-type Esp. Furthermore, an E. faecalis strain expressing only the N-terminal domain of Esp fused to a heterologous protein anchor formed biofilms that were quantitatively similar to those formed by a strain expressing full-length Esp. This suggested that the minimal region contributing to Esp-mediated biofilm enhancement in E. faecalis was confined to the nonrepeat N-terminal domain. Expression of full-length E. faecalis Esp in heterologous host systems of esp-deficient Lactococcus lactis and Enterococcus faecium did not enhance biofilm formation as was observed for E. faecalis. These results suggest that Esp may require interaction with an additional E. faecalis-specific factor(s) to result in biofilm enhancement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16109963      PMCID: PMC1196143          DOI: 10.1128/JB.187.17.6213-6222.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  49 in total

Review 1.  Riddle of biofilm resistance.

Authors:  K Lewis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation.

Authors:  Cynthia B Whitchurch; Tim Tolker-Nielsen; Paula C Ragas; John S Mattick
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Biofilm formation: a clinically relevant microbiological process.

Authors:  R M Donlan
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-09-20       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT.

Authors:  A Heydorn; A T Nielsen; M Hentzer; C Sternberg; M Givskov; B K Ersbøll; S Molin
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.777

5.  Forging a link between biofilms and disease.

Authors:  C Potera
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Bap, a Staphylococcus aureus surface protein involved in biofilm formation.

Authors:  C Cucarella; C Solano; J Valle; B Amorena; I Lasa ; J R Penadés
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  The enterococcal surface protein, Esp, is involved in Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation.

Authors:  A Toledo-Arana; J Valle; C Solano; M J Arrizubieta; C Cucarella; M Lamata; B Amorena; J Leiva; J R Penadés; I Lasa
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 8.  Staphylococcus and biofilms.

Authors:  Friedrich Götz
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.501

9.  Nosocomial infections in combined medical-surgical intensive care units in the United States.

Authors:  M J Richards; J R Edwards; D H Culver; R P Gaynes
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 10.  Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms.

Authors:  Rodney M Donlan; J William Costerton
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 26.132

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Structure, Function, and Assembly of Adhesive Organelles by Uropathogenic Bacteria.

Authors:  Peter Chahales; David G Thanassi
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2015-10

2.  Growth condition-dependent Esp expression by Enterococcus faecium affects initial adherence and biofilm formation.

Authors:  Willem J B Van Wamel; Antoni P A Hendrickx; Marc J M Bonten; Janetta Top; George Posthuma; Rob J L Willems
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Virulence factors of Enterococcus strains isolated from patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Edyta Golińska; Anna Tomusiak; Tomasz Gosiewski; Grażyna Więcek; Agnieszka Machul; Diana Mikołajczyk; Małgorzata Bulanda; Piotr B Heczko; Magdalena Strus
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Biofilm Matrix Proteins.

Authors:  Jiunn N C Fong; Fitnat H Yildiz
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2015-04

5.  Molecular epidemiology of Enterococcus faecium isolates from an Italian hospital.

Authors:  L Fallico; C Boldrin; A Grossato; E Franchin; E De Canale; T Tommasini; S G Parisi; R Manganelli; G Palù
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.553

6.  Enterococcal surface protein Esp is important for biofilm formation of Enterococcus faecium E1162.

Authors:  Esther Heikens; Marc J M Bonten; Rob J L Willems
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Biofilm and planktonic Enterococcus faecalis elicit different responses from host phagocytes in vitro.

Authors:  Kasturee Daw; Arto S Baghdayan; Shanjana Awasthi; Nathan Shankar
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-08

8.  Comprehensive molecular, genomic and phenotypic analysis of a major clone of Enterococcus faecalis MLST ST40.

Authors:  Melanie Zischka; Carsten T Künne; Jochen Blom; Dominique Wobser; Türkân Sakιnç; Kerstin Schmidt-Hohagen; P Wojtek Dabrowski; Andreas Nitsche; Johannes Hübner; Torsten Hain; Trinad Chakraborty; Burkhard Linke; Alexander Goesmann; Sonja Voget; Rolf Daniel; Dietmar Schomburg; Rüdiger Hauck; Hafez M Hafez; Petra Tielen; Dieter Jahn; Margrete Solheim; Ewa Sadowy; Jesper Larsen; Lars B Jensen; Patricia Ruiz-Garbajosa; Dianelys Quiñones Pérez; Theresa Mikalsen; Jennifer Bender; Matthias Steglich; Ulrich Nübel; Wolfgang Witte; Guido Werner
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Biofilm-associated proteins: news from Acinetobacter.

Authors:  Eliana De Gregorio; Mariateresa Del Franco; Marianna Martinucci; Emanuela Roscetto; Raffaele Zarrilli; Pier Paolo Di Nocera
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  The N-terminal domain of the thermo-regulated surface protein PrpA of Enterococcus faecium binds to fibrinogen, fibronectin and platelets.

Authors:  Ana M Guzmán Prieto; Rolf T Urbanus; Xinglin Zhang; Damien Bierschenk; C Arnold Koekman; Miranda van Luit-Asbroek; Janneke P Ouwerkerk; Marieke Pape; Fernanda L Paganelli; Dominique Wobser; Johannes Huebner; Antoni P A Hendrickx; Marc J M Bonten; Rob J L Willems; Willem van Schaik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.