BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is an important complication of ischemic stroke and increases mortality 3-fold. Five guidelines recommend a dysphagia screen before oral intake. What constitutes an adequate dysphagia screen and which patients should receive it remain unclear. METHODS: Fifteen acute care institutions prospectively collected data on all admitted patients with acute ischemic stroke. Sites were required to collect data on demographics and 4 quality indicators. Optional data included stroke severity and complications. We measured adherence to a screen for dysphagia, the type of screen, and development of in-hospital pneumonia. RESULTS: Between December 2001 and January 2003, 2532 cases were collected. In-hospital complications were recorded on 2329 (92%) of cases. Stroke severity was captured on 1361 (54%). Adherence to a dysphagia screen was 61%. Six sites had a formal dysphagia screen, and their adherence rate was 78% compared with 57% at sites with no formal screen. The pneumonia rate at sites with a formal dysphagia screen was 2.4% versus 5.4% (P=0.0016) at sites with no formal screen. There was no difference in median stroke severity (5 versus 4; P=0.84) between the sites with and without a formal screen. A formal dysphagia screen prevented pneumonia even after adjusting for stroke severity. CONCLUSIONS: A formal dysphagia screen is associated with a higher adherence rate to dysphagia screens and a significantly decreased risk of pneumonia. A formal screening protocol should be offered to all stroke patients, regardless of stroke severity.
BACKGROUND:Pneumonia is an important complication of ischemic stroke and increases mortality 3-fold. Five guidelines recommend a dysphagia screen before oral intake. What constitutes an adequate dysphagia screen and which patients should receive it remain unclear. METHODS: Fifteen acute care institutions prospectively collected data on all admitted patients with acute ischemic stroke. Sites were required to collect data on demographics and 4 quality indicators. Optional data included stroke severity and complications. We measured adherence to a screen for dysphagia, the type of screen, and development of in-hospital pneumonia. RESULTS: Between December 2001 and January 2003, 2532 cases were collected. In-hospital complications were recorded on 2329 (92%) of cases. Stroke severity was captured on 1361 (54%). Adherence to a dysphagia screen was 61%. Six sites had a formal dysphagia screen, and their adherence rate was 78% compared with 57% at sites with no formal screen. The pneumonia rate at sites with a formal dysphagia screen was 2.4% versus 5.4% (P=0.0016) at sites with no formal screen. There was no difference in median stroke severity (5 versus 4; P=0.84) between the sites with and without a formal screen. A formal dysphagia screen prevented pneumonia even after adjusting for stroke severity. CONCLUSIONS: A formal dysphagia screen is associated with a higher adherence rate to dysphagia screens and a significantly decreased risk of pneumonia. A formal screening protocol should be offered to all strokepatients, regardless of stroke severity.
Authors: Sarah Hoffmann; Hendrik Harms; Lena Ulm; Darius G Nabavi; Bruno-Marcel Mackert; Ingo Schmehl; Gerhard J Jungehulsing; Joan Montaner; Alejandro Bustamante; Marcella Hermans; Frank Hamilton; Jos Göhler; Uwe Malzahn; Carolin Malsch; Peter U Heuschmann; Christian Meisel; Andreas Meisel Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2016-10-14 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: William L Palmer; Alex Bottle; Charlie Davie; Charles A Vincent; Paul Aylin Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Tobias Warnecke; Inga Teismann; Stephan Oelenberg; Christina Hamacher; E Bernd Ringelstein; Wolf R Schäbitz; Rainer Dziewas Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2009-03-10 Impact factor: 2.463