Literature DB >> 16109897

Hind limb proportions and kinematics: are small primates different from other small mammals?

Manuela Schmidt1.   

Abstract

Similar in body size, locomotor behaviour and morphology to the last common ancestor of Primates, living small quadrupedal primates provide a convenient model for investigating the evolution of primate locomotion. In this study, the hind limb kinematics of quadrupedal walking in mouse lemurs, brown lemurs, cotton-top tamarins and squirrel monkeys are analysed using cineradiography. The scaling of hind limb length to body size and the intralimb proportions of the three-segmented hind limb are taken into consideration when kinematic similarities and differences are discussed. Hind limb kinematics of arboreal quadrupedal primates, ranging in size between 100 g and 3000 g, are size independent and resemble the hind limb kinematics of small non-cursorial mammals. A common feature seen in smaller mammals, in general, is the horizontal position of the thigh at touchdown and of the lower leg at lift-off. Thus, the maximum bone length is immediately transferred into the step length. The vertical position of the leg at the beginning of a step cycle and of the thigh at lift-off contributes the same distance to pivot height. Step length and pivot height increase proportionally with hind limb length, because intralimb proportions of the hind limb remain fairly constant. Therefore, the strong positive allometric scaling of the hind limb in arboreal quadrupedal primates affects neither the kinematics of hind limb segments nor the total angular excursion of the limb. The angular excursion of the hind limb in quadrupedal primates is equal to that of other non-cursorial mammals. Hence, hind limb excursion in larger cercopithecine primates differs from that of other large mammals due to the decreasing angular excursion as part of convergent cursorial adaptations in several phylogenetic lineages of mammals. Typical members of those phylogenetic groups are traditionally used in comparison with typical primates, and therefore the ;uniqueness' of primate locomotor characteristics is often overrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16109897     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  4 in total

1.  Fibre type composition in the lumbar perivertebral muscles of primates: implications for the evolution of orthogrady in hominoids.

Authors:  J Neufuss; B Hesse; S K S Thorpe; E E Vereecke; K D'Aout; M S Fischer; N Schilling
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Videoradiographic analysis of the range of motion in unilateral experimental knee joint arthritis in rats.

Authors:  Michael K Boettger; Johannes Leuchtweis; Hans-Georg Schaible; Manuela Schmidt
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 5.156

3.  Scaling of convex hull volume to body mass in modern primates, non-primate mammals and birds.

Authors:  Charlotte A Brassey; William I Sellers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Kinematic and Gait Similarities between Crawling Human Infants and Other Quadruped Mammals.

Authors:  Ludovic Righetti; Anna Nylén; Kerstin Rosander; Auke Jan Ijspeert
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 4.003

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.