Literature DB >> 16109705

Untangling long branches: identifying conflicting phylogenetic signals using spectral analysis, neighbor-net, and consensus networks.

Martyn Kennedy1, Barbara R Holland, Russell D Gray, Hamish G Spencer.   

Abstract

Long-branch attraction is a well-known source of systematic error that can mislead phylogenetic methods; it is frequently invoked post hoc, upon recovering a different tree from the one expected based on prior evidence. We demonstrate that methods that do not force the data onto a single tree, such as spectral analysis, Neighbor-Net, and consensus networks, can be used to detect conflicting signals within the data, including those caused by long-branch attraction. We illustrate this approach using a set of taxa from three unambiguously monophyletic families within the Pelecaniformes: the darters, the cormorants and shags, and the gannets and boobies. These three families are universally acknowledged as forming a monophyletic group, but the relationship between the families remains contentious. Using sequence data from three mitochondrial genes (12S, ATPase 6, and ATPase 8) we demonstrate that the relationship between these three families is difficult to resolve because they are separated by a short internal branch and there are conflicting signals due to long-branch attraction, which are confounded with nonhomogeneous sequence evolution across the different genes. Spectral analysis, Neighbor-Net, and consensus networks reveal conflicting signals regarding the placement of one of the darters, with support found for darter monophyly, but also support for a conflicting grouping with the outgroup, pelicans. Furthermore, parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses produced different trees, with one of the two most parsimonious trees not supporting the monophyly of the darters. Monte Carlo simulations, however, were not sensitive enough to reveal long-branch attraction unless the branches are longer than those actually observed. These results indicate that spectral analysis, Neighbor-Net, and consensus networks offer a powerful approach to detecting and understanding the source of conflicting signals within phylogenetic data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16109705     DOI: 10.1080/106351591007462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  16 in total

1.  Phylogenetic analysis of pelecaniformes (aves) based on osteological data: implications for waterbird phylogeny and fossil calibration studies.

Authors:  Nathan D Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  On the shape and fabric of human history.

Authors:  Russell D Gray; David Bryant; Simon J Greenhill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Analysis of the mitochondrial genome of the Indian darter, Anhinga melanogaster, suggests a species status taxonomic rank.

Authors:  Subhash Thomas; Hijam Surachandra Singha; Ranganathan Kamalakkannan; Sarah Gaughan; Karippadakam Bhavana; Muniyandi Nagarajan
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  New taxonomic framework for Arthrodermataceae: a comprehensive analysis based on their phylogenetic reconstruction, divergence time estimation, phylogenetic split network, and phylogeography.

Authors:  Zhi-Yuan Zhang; Yu-Lian Ren; Xin Li; Wan-Hao Chen; Jian-Dong Liang; Yan-Feng Han; Zong-Qi Liang
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.158

5.  Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion.

Authors:  Bradley C Livezey; Richard L Zusi
Journal:  Zool J Linn Soc       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 3.286

6.  Overcoming the effects of rogue taxa: Evolutionary relationships of the bee flies.

Authors:  Michelle D Trautwein; Brian M Wiegmann; David K Yeates
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2011-05-05

7.  Prevalence and evolution of core photosystem II genes in marine cyanobacterial viruses and their hosts.

Authors:  Matthew B Sullivan; Debbie Lindell; Jessica A Lee; Luke R Thompson; Joseph P Bielawski; Sallie W Chisholm
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Single-copy nuclear genes resolve the phylogeny of the holometabolous insects.

Authors:  Brian M Wiegmann; Michelle D Trautwein; Jung-Wook Kim; Brian K Cassel; Matthew A Bertone; Shaun L Winterton; David K Yeates
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 7.431

9.  Cyto-nuclear discordance in the phylogeny of Ficus section Galoglychia and host shifts in plant-pollinator associations.

Authors:  Julien P Renoult; Finn Kjellberg; Cinderella Grout; Sylvain Santoni; Bouchaïb Khadari
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  A nuclear ribosomal DNA phylogeny of acer inferred with maximum likelihood, splits graphs, and motif analysis of 606 sequences.

Authors:  Guido W Grimm; Susanne S Renner; Alexandros Stamatakis; Vera Hemleben
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2007-02-17       Impact factor: 1.625

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.