Literature DB >> 16109054

Therapeutic benefit of eletriptan compared to sumatriptan for the acute relief of migraine pain--results of a model-based meta-analysis that accounts for encapsulation.

J W Mandema1, E Cox, J Alderman.   

Abstract

A novel model-based meta-analysis was used to quantify the dose-response relationship of sumatriptan and eletriptan for the proportion of patients that achieve migraine pain relief up to 4 h after treatment. The proportion of patients that became pain free was also evaluated. This analysis includes some unique features, allowing comparison of sumatriptan and eletriptan doses that have not been directly compared in a head to head study and also permitting comparison between the two drugs at multiple time points up to 4 h after treatment. Because the analysis allows comparison of response to blinded sumatriptan with that to marketed sumatriptan and contains timepoints as early as 0.5 h, it is especially suited to detection of possible effects of encapsulation on sumatriptan's therapeutic effectiveness and thus was employed to assess this also. Data from 19 randomized placebo controlled clinical trials were jointly analysed using a random-effects logistic regression model. The results of this analysis show a significant clinical benefit of eletriptan 40 mg compared to sumatriptan 100 mg at any point in time up to 4 h after treatment. The benefit of eletriptan 40 mg is greatest around 1.5-2 h after treatment with an absolute difference at 2 h of 9.1% (7.4-11.5%) more patients achieving pain relief and 7.3% (5.8-8.6%) more patient achieving pain free when compared to sumatriptan 100 mg. An absolute benefit of more than 5% of patients is maintained from 45 min up to 4 h after treatment for pain relief and from 1.5 h up to 4 h for pain free. Eletriptan 20 mg was superior to sumatriptan 50 mg and similar to sumatriptan 100 mg for pain relief while it was similar to sumatriptan 50 mg for pain free. The benefit of eletriptan 20 mg when compared to sumatriptan 50 mg is greatest around 1.5-2 h after treatment with an absolute difference at 2 h of 5.0% (2.9-8.1%) more patients achieving pain relief. An absolute benefit of more than 3% of patients was maintained from 1 h up to 3 h after treatment. No significant difference was found between eletriptan 20 mg and sumatriptan 50 mg for the fraction of patients that became pain free. No significant effect of encapsulation of sumatriptan was found on the time course of response up to 4 h after treatment when compared to commercial sumatriptan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16109054     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2004.00939.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cephalalgia        ISSN: 0333-1024            Impact factor:   6.292


  21 in total

1.  Longitudinal aggregate data model-based meta-analysis with NONMEM: approaches to handling within treatment arm correlation.

Authors:  Jae Eun Ahn; Jonathan L French
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Population pharmacodynamic modeling of various extended-release formulations of methylphenidate in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder via meta-analysis.

Authors:  Holly Kimko; Ekaterina Gibiansky; Leonid Gibiansky; H Lynn Starr; Joris Berwaerts; Joseph Massarella; Frank Wiegand
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacology considerations in biologics development.

Authors:  Liang Zhao; Tian-hua Ren; Diane D Wang
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Between subjects variability in haemoglobin and dose are not associated with the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent used to treat anaemia in dialysis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juan José Pérez-Ruixo; Mercedes Cucala-Ramos; Ester García-Gonzalo; Beatriz Del Val Romero; Neus Valveny
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Efficacy of triptans for the treatment of acute migraines: a quantitative comparison based on the dose-effect and time-course characteristics.

Authors:  Mengyuan Hou; Hongxia Liu; Yunfei Li; Ling Xu; Yingchun He; Yinghua Lv; Qingshan Zheng; Lujin Li
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  Eletriptan: a review of its use in the acute treatment of migraine.

Authors:  Paul L McCormack; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Model-based development of gemcabene, a new lipid-altering agent.

Authors:  Jaap W Mandema; David Hermann; Wenping Wang; Tim Sheiner; Mark Milad; Rebecca Bakker-Arkema; Daniel Hartman
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 8.  Pharmacometrics: The Already-Present Future of Precision Pharmacology.

Authors:  Lorena Cera Bandeira; Leonardo Pinto; Cláudia Martins Carneiro
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 1.337

9.  The pharmacological management of migraine, part 1: overview and abortive therapy.

Authors:  George Demaagd
Journal:  P T       Date:  2008-07

10.  A novel model-based meta-analysis to indirectly estimate the comparative efficacy of two medications: an example using DPP-4 inhibitors, sitagliptin and linagliptin, in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Jorge Luiz Gross; James Rogers; Daniel Polhamus; William Gillespie; Christian Friedrich; Yan Gong; Brigitta Ursula Monz; Sanjay Patel; Alexander Staab; Silke Retlich
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.