Literature DB >> 16108902

Biomarkers of exposure to passive smoking of school children: frequency and determinants.

A Thaqi1, K Franke, G Merkel, H-E Wichmann, J Heinrich.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study aims to assess the extent of children' exposure to ETS and quantify potential determinants. A total of 2767 children aged 5-14 years participated in an environmental survey in East Germany in 1998-1999 (participation rate 75.9%). A subgroup of 979 children between the ages of 11 and 14 years with complete data on nicotine and cotinine in urine were selected for this analysis. This study population consisted of 73 self-reported smokers (7.5%), 793 non-smokers (81%) and 113 children with missing data on smoking status (11.5%). Nicotine and cotinine concentrations in spontaneous urine sample were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography methods with ultraviolet-detection and corrected for creatinine. Approximately 40% of self-reported non-smokers were exposed to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) at home. Non-smoking children exposed to parental tobacco smoke at home compared with not exposed showed in average higher nicotine and cotinine concentration (geometric mean 4.7 microg/l vs. 1.4 microg/l and 8.1 microg/l vs. 2.7 microg/l) and the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for detectable biomarkers ranged between 17 and 22. There were increased rates of detectable biomarkers in urine with increasing numbers of smoked cigarettes in the household (adjusted OR increased from 8 to 54). Maternal smoking showed a stronger effect than paternal smoking. Furthermore, low parental education, cold season, height of dwelling (<or=2.40), urine collected on Monday were statistically significant associated with high nicotine and cotinine excretion levels. Children exposed to parental smoke showed much higher biomarker levels than the non-smoking spouse of an adult smoker. Therefore, children need specifically protection from ETS at home. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: As children showed a higher internal exposure compared with adults the health hazards association with passive smoking might have a more serious effect in children. Children are unable to complain and unable to remove themselves from tobacco smoke exposure. Thus, parents should make sure that their children live in a smoke free environment. Each country should take all necessary legislative and regulatory measures which forbids smoking in public places and the home environment even if it requires sacrifices by the parents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16108902     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00361.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  18 in total

1.  Biomarkers of passive smoking among Greek preschool children.

Authors:  Constantine I Vardavas; Manolis N Tzatzarakis; Aristeidis M Tsatsakis; Dimitrios Athanasopoulos; Evaggelia Balomenaki; Manolis K Linardakis; Anthony G Kafatos
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Age-dependent sensitivity of the mouse kidney to chronic nicotine exposure.

Authors:  Istvan Arany; Samuel Hall; Mehul Dixit
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.756

3.  Changes in child exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (CHETS) study after implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland: national cross sectional survey.

Authors:  Patricia C Akhtar; Dorothy B Currie; Candace E Currie; Sally J Haw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-09-09

4.  Prevalence and Predictors of Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure among Adolescents in Cambodia.

Authors:  Emmanuel Rudatsikira; Seter Siziya; Adamson S Muula
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2010-01

5.  Prevalence and correlates of environmental tobacco smoke exposure among adolescents in Mongolia.

Authors:  Emmanuel Rudatsikira; Seter Siziya; Jargalsaikhan Dondog; Adamson S Muula
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Passive smoking and inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Deborah T Jones; Mark T Osterman; Meenakshi Bewtra; James D Lewis
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 7.  [Influence of environmental factors on allergy development].

Authors:  W Schober; H Behrendt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Determinants of urinary 1-hydroxypyrene glucuronide in South Korean children.

Authors:  Kyoung-Ho Lee; Roel Vermeulen; Virissa Lenters; Soo-Hun Cho; Paul T Strickland; Daehee Kang
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Changes in child exposure to secondhand smoke after implementation of smoke-free legislation in Wales: a repeated cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jo C Holliday; Graham F Moore; Laurence A R Moore
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Predictors of childhood exposure to parental secondhand smoke in the house and family car.

Authors:  Vassiliki Mantziou; Constantine I Vardavas; Eleni Kletsiou; Kostas N Priftis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.