Literature DB >> 1610845

Early adolescent knowledge and attitudes about circumcision: methods and implications for research.

N M Schlossberger1, R A Turner, C E Irwin.   

Abstract

The psychosocial effects of circumcision status on the adolescent male are unclear. This study explored methods for assessing attitudes toward circumcision of early adolescents and differences in satisfaction between circumcised and uncircumcised males that would warrant further investigation. Seventy-three boys, aged 11 through 14 years completed the Petersen Body Image Scale and a questionnaire concerning their own circumcision status, satisfaction with that status, and perceptions about the status of other family members and peers. To assess knowledge, subjects identified diagrams depicting differing circumcision states during a personal interview. Physical examination confirmed reported circumcision status. Of the study group, 19% (n = 14) were uncircumcised. Use of visual aids to report circumcision status was more accurate (92%) than self-report (68%). Circumcised boys scored higher on satisfaction items than did uncircumcised boys, (t(15.65) = -3.96, p less than 0.001). No differences in general body image were found between groups. Further research that examines psychosocial outcomes of circumcision status is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1610845     DOI: 10.1016/1054-139x(92)90162-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  9 in total

1.  Sexually transmitted infections and male circumcision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert S Van Howe
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2013-04-16

2.  Male circumcision and women's risk of incident chlamydial, gonococcal, and trichomonal infections.

Authors:  Abigail Norris Turner; Charles S Morrison; Nancy S Padian; Jay S Kaufman; Frieda M Behets; Robert A Salata; Francis A Mmiro; Tsungai Chipato; David D Celentano; Sungwal Rugpao; William C Miller
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Avoiding risky sex partners: perception of partners' risks v partners' self reported risks.

Authors:  B P Stoner; W L H Whittington; S O Aral; J P Hughes; H H Handsfield; K K Holmes
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 4.  A 'snip' in time: what is the best age to circumcise?

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Jake H Waskett; Joya Banerjee; Richard G Wamai; Aaron A R Tobian; Ronald H Gray; Stefan A Bailis; Robert C Bailey; Jeffrey D Klausner; Robin J Willcourt; Daniel T Halperin; Thomas E Wiswell; Adrian Mindel
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.125

5.  The (mis)reporting of male circumcision status among men and women in Zambia and Swaziland: a randomized evaluation of interview methods.

Authors:  Paul C Hewett; Nicole Haberland; Lou Apicella; Barbara S Mensch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Men in Papua New Guinea accurately report their circumcision status.

Authors:  Parana Hewage Mangalasiri Jayathunge; William John Hannan McBride; David MacLaren; Kelwyn Browne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Critical evaluation of contrasting evidence on whether male circumcision has adverse psychological effects: A systematic review.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Stephen Moreton; Stefan A Bailis; Guy Cox; John N Krieger
Journal:  J Evid Based Med       Date:  2022-07-04

Review 8.  Reconstructive surgery for hypospadias: A systematic review of long-term patient satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Adams; Aivar Bracka
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

9.  Critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision: A systematic review.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Stephen Moreton; John N Krieger
Journal:  J Evid Based Med       Date:  2019-09-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.