Literature DB >> 16107519

Gaze orienting in dynamic visual double steps.

Joyce Vliegen1, Tom J Van Grootel, A John Van Opstal.   

Abstract

Visual stimuli are initially represented in a retinotopic reference frame. To maintain spatial accuracy of gaze (i.e., eye in space) despite intervening eye and head movements, the visual input could be combined with dynamic feedback about ongoing gaze shifts. Alternatively, target coordinates could be updated in advance by using the preprogrammed gaze-motor command ("predictive remapping"). So far, previous experiments have not dissociated these possibilities. Here we study whether the visuomotor system accounts for saccadic eye-head movements that occur during target presentation. In this case, the system has to deal with fast dynamic changes of the retinal input and with highly variable changes in relative eye and head movements that cannot be preprogrammed by the gaze control system. We performed visual-visual double-step experiments in which a brief (50-ms) stimulus was presented during a saccadic eye-head gaze shift toward a previously flashed visual target. Our results show that gaze shifts remain accurate under these dynamic conditions, even for stimuli presented near saccade onset, and that eyes and head are driven in oculocentric and craniocentric coordinates, respectively. These results cannot be explained by a predictive remapping scheme. We propose that the visuomotor system adequately processes dynamic changes in visual input that result from self-initiated gaze shifts, to construct a stable representation of visual targets in an absolute, supraretinal (e.g., world) reference frame. Predictive remapping may subserve transsaccadic integration, thus enabling perception of a stable visual scene despite eye movements, whereas dynamic feedback ensures accurate actions (e.g., eye-head orienting) to a selected goal.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16107519     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00027.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  12 in total

1.  Spatial updating in monkey superior colliculus in the absence of the forebrain commissures: dissociation between superficial and intermediate layers.

Authors:  Catherine A Dunn; Nathan J Hall; Carol L Colby
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Differential influence of attention on gaze and head movements.

Authors:  Aarlenne Z Khan; Gunnar Blohm; Robert M McPeek; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Spatial constancy mechanisms in motor control.

Authors:  W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Saccadic compensation for reflexive optokinetic nystagmus just as good as compensation for volitional pursuit.

Authors:  James J Harrison; Tom C A Freeman; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Dynamic sound localization in cats.

Authors:  Janet L Ruhland; Amy E Jones; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Afferent motor feedback determines the perceived location of tactile stimuli in the external space presented to the moving arm.

Authors:  Femke Maij; Alan M Wing; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Spatial updating and the maintenance of visual constancy.

Authors:  E M Klier; D E Angelaki
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Interaction between the oculomotor and postural systems during a dual-task: Compensatory reductions in head sway following visually-induced postural perturbations promote the production of accurate double-step saccades in standing human adults.

Authors:  Mathieu Boulanger; Guillaume Giraudet; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Modeling auditory-visual evoked eye-head gaze shifts in dynamic multisteps.

Authors:  Bahadir Kasap; A John van Opstal
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Experimental test of spatial updating models for monkey eye-head gaze shifts.

Authors:  Tom J Van Grootel; Robert F Van der Willigen; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.