Literature DB >> 16106446

The number of CD34(+) cells in peripheral blood as a predictor of the CD34(+) yield in patients going to autologous stem cell transplantation.

A L Basquiera1, P Abichain, J C Damonte, B Ricchi, A G Sturich, E D Palazzo, J J García.   

Abstract

The number of CD34(+) cells in peripheral blood (PB) is a guide to the optimal timing to harvest peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). The objective was to determine the number of CD34(+) cells in PB that allows achieving a final apheresis product containing > or =1.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, performing up to three aphereses. Between March 1999 and August 2003, patients with hematological and solid malignancies who underwent leukapheresis for autologous bone marrow transplantation were prospectively evaluated. Seventy-two aphereses in 48 patients were performed (mean 1.45 per patient; range 1-3). PBPC were mobilized with cyclophosphamide plus recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) (n = 40), other chemotherapy drugs plus G-CSF (n = 7), or G-CSF alone (n = 1). We found a strong correlation between the CD34(+) cells count in peripheral blood and the CD34(+) cells yielded (r = 0.903; P < 0.0001). Using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the minimum number of CD34(+) cells in PB to obtain > or =1.5 x 10(6)/kg in the first apheresis was 16.48 cells/microL (sensitivity 100%; specificity 95%). The best cut-off point necessary to obtain the same target in the final harvest was 15.48 cells/microL, performing up to three aphereses (sensitivity 89%; specificity 100%). In our experience, > or =15 CD34(+) cells/microL is the best predictor to begin the apheresis procedure. Based on this threshold level, it is possible to achieve at least 1.5 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells in the graft with < or =3 collections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16106446     DOI: 10.1002/jca.20062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Apher        ISSN: 0733-2459            Impact factor:   2.821


  5 in total

1.  Isolation Methods for Human CD34 Subsets Using Fluorescent and Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting: an In Vivo Comparative Study.

Authors:  Himi Tripathi; Hsuan Peng; Renee Donahue; Lakshman Chelvarajan; Anuhya Gottipati; Bryana Levitan; Ahmed Al-Darraji; Erhe Gao; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Bradley J Berron
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.739

2.  A Comparison of Fresenius Com.Tec Cell and Spectra Optia Cell Separators for Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Collections: Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Serife Solmaz; Selda Kahraman; Omur Gokmen Sevindik; Celal Acar; Munire Turkyilmaz; Inci Alacacioglu; Ozden Piskin; Mehmet Ali Ozcan; Hayri Guner Ozsan; Bulent Undar; Fatih Demirkan
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  Three-stage ex vivo expansion of high-ploidy megakaryocytic cells: toward large-scale platelet production.

Authors:  Swapna Panuganti; Alaina C Schlinker; Paul F Lindholm; Eleftherios T Papoutsakis; William M Miller
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Proposed definition of 'poor mobilizer' in lymphoma and multiple myeloma: an analytic hierarchy process by ad hoc working group Gruppo ItalianoTrapianto di Midollo Osseo.

Authors:  A Olivieri; M Marchetti; R Lemoli; C Tarella; A Iacone; F Lanza; A Rambaldi; A Bosi
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 5.  Optimizing Stem Cells Mobilization Strategies to Ameliorate Patient Outcomes: A Review of Guide- lines and Recommendations.

Authors:  Saeed Mohammadi; Ashraf Malek Mohammadi; Mohsen Nikbakht; Amir Hossein Norooznezhad; Kamran Alimoghaddam; Ardeshir Ghavamzadeh
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res       Date:  2017-01-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.