Literature DB >> 16106261

Conservation genetics of amphibians.

T J C Beebee1.   

Abstract

Amphibians are good models for investigating the genetics of wild animal populations because they are: (1) widely distributed in most ecosystems; (2) easy to sample in breeding assemblages; (3) often philopatric to breeding sites, generating high levels of population genetic structure; (4) amenable to controlled crossings in the laboratory; and (5) of major conservation concern. Neutral genetic markers, mostly microsatellites, have been used successfully in studies of amphibian effective population sizes and structures, and in assessing the consequences of hybridisation. Phylogeography has provided important insights into population histories and the fates of introductions. Quantitative genetic methods have demonstrated adaptive variation in life history traits of importance to fitness and therefore to population viability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16106261     DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  28 in total

1.  MHC structuring and divergent allele advantage in a urodele amphibian: a hierarchical multi-scale approach.

Authors:  Lorenzo Talarico; Wiesław Babik; Silvio Marta; Venusta Pietrocini; Marco Mattoccia
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  An improved microsatellite panel to assess genetic variability of the Italian smooth newt (Lissotriton vulgaris meridionalis).

Authors:  Vincenzo Buono; Giorgia Galliani; Emiliano Mancini; Francesca Davoli; Chiara Mengoni; Nadia Mucci; Leonardo Vignoli
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 3.  A review on the conservation genetic studies of Indian amphibians and their implications on developing strategies for conservation.

Authors:  Priti Hebbar; G Ravikanth; N A Aravind
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Effects of geographic distance, sea barriers and habitat on the genetic structure and diversity of all-hybrid water frog populations.

Authors:  D G Christiansen; H-U Reyer
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Microsatellite analysis supports mitochondrial phylogeography of the hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis).

Authors:  Maria Tonione; Jarrett R Johnson; Eric J Routman
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Population genetics of the São Tomé caecilian (Gymnophiona: Dermophiidae: Schistometopum thomense) reveals strong geographic structuring.

Authors:  Ricka E Stoelting; G John Measey; Robert C Drewes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genotoxic effect of a binary mixture of dicamba- and glyphosate-based commercial herbicide formulations on Rhinella arenarum (Hensel, 1867) (Anura, Bufonidae) late-stage larvae.

Authors:  Sonia Soloneski; Celeste Ruiz de Arcaute; Marcelo L Larramendy
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Mapping of quantitative trait loci for life history traits segregating within common frog populations.

Authors:  Gemma Palomar; Anti Vasemägi; Freed Ahmad; Alfredo G Nicieza; José Manuel Cano
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Idiosyncratic responses to drivers of genetic differentiation in the complex landscapes of Isthmian Central America.

Authors:  Adrián García-Rodríguez; Carlos E Guarnizo; Andrew J Crawford; Adrian A Garda; Gabriel C Costa
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Delimiting genetic units in Neotropical toads under incomplete lineage sorting and hybridization.

Authors:  Maria Tereza C Thomé; Kelly R Zamudio; Célio F B Haddad; João Alexandrino
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.