Literature DB >> 16105975

High-dose therapy intensification compared with continued standard chemotherapy in multiple myeloma patients responding to the initial chemotherapy: long-term results from a prospective randomized trial from the Spanish cooperative group PETHEMA.

Joan Bladé1, Laura Rosiñol, Ana Sureda, Josep M Ribera, Joaquín Díaz-Mediavilla, José García-Laraña, M Victoria Mateos, Luis Palomera, Javier Fernández-Calvo, Josep M Martí, Pilar Giraldo, Félix Carbonell, Manel Callís, Jesús Trujillo, Santiago Gardella, M Jesús Moro, Abelardo Barez, Alfons Soler, Llorenç Font, Montserrat Fontanillas, Jesús San Miguel.   

Abstract

The aim of the present randomized trial was to compare high-dose therapy (HDT) with continued conventional chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who responded to the initial treatment. From May 1994 to October 1999, 216 patients (122 men/94 women; stage II or III; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] score less than 3) entered the study. Initial chemotherapy consisted of 4 cycles of alternating vincristine, BCNU, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, prednisone/vincristine, BCNU, Adriamycin, dexamethasone (VBMCP/VBAD). Responding patients were randomly assigned to receive 8 additional cycles of VBMCP/VBAD, intensification with melphalan 200 mg/m2, or melphalan 140 mg/m2 plus 12 Gy fractionated total body irradiation (TBI). One-hundred sixty-four patients were randomly assigned, 83 to continued chemotherapy and 81 to HDT. The complete remission (CR) rate was significantly higher with HDT (30% vs 11%; P = .002). However, progression-free survival (PFS) was not significantly different between HDT and conventional therapy (median, 42 vs 33 months; P = not significant [NS]), and overall survival (OS) was similar in both groups (median, 61 vs 66 months). Finally, survival after relapse was identical in the 2 arms (15.9 vs 16.4 months). In conclusion, these results show that HDT intensification, when given to myeloma patients who have responded to the initial chemotherapy, significantly increases the CR rate but has no significant impact on PFS or OS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16105975     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  58 in total

1.  Detection of serum tumor markers in multiple myeloma using the CLINPROT system.

Authors:  Aili He; Ju Bai; Chen Huang; Juan Yang; Wanggang Zhang; Jianli Wang; Yun Yang; Pengyu Zhang; Fuling Zhou
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  High melphalan exposure is associated with improved overall survival in myeloma patients receiving high dose melphalan and autologous transplantation.

Authors:  Christa E Nath; Judith Trotman; Campbell Tiley; Peter Presgrave; Douglas Joshua; Ian Kerridge; Yiu Lam Kwan; Howard Gurney; Andrew J McLachlan; John W Earl; Ian Nivison-Smith; Lihua Zeng; Peter J Shaw
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Early versus delayed autologous transplantation after immunomodulatory agents-based induction therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Shaji K Kumar; Martha Q Lacy; Angela Dispenzieri; Francis K Buadi; Suzanne R Hayman; David Dingli; Francesca Gay; Shirshendu Sinha; Nelson Leung; William Hogan; S Vincent Rajkumar; Morie A Gertz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Secondary malignancies following high dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation-systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  I Vaxman; R Ram; A Gafter-Gvili; L Vidal; M Yeshurun; M Lahav; O Shpilberg
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Arsenic trioxide with ascorbic acid and high-dose melphalan: results of a phase II randomized trial.

Authors:  Muzaffar H Qazilbash; Rima M Saliba; Yago Nieto; Gaurav Parikh; Matteo Pelosini; Fatima B Khan; Roy B Jones; Chitra Hosing; Floralyn Mendoza; Donna M Weber; Michael Wang; Uday Popat; Amin Alousi; Paolo Anderlini; Richard E Champlin; Sergio Giralt
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 7.  First line vs delayed transplantation in myeloma: Certainties and controversies.

Authors:  Annamaria Brioli
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-06-24

8.  Current approaches to the initial treatment of symptomatic multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jagoda K Jasielec; Andrzej J Jakubowiak
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-02

Review 9.  Lenalidomide in myeloma.

Authors:  Seema Singhal; Jayesh Mehta
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2007-04

10.  Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Shaji K Kumar; Joseph R Mikhael; Francis K Buadi; David Dingli; Angela Dispenzieri; Rafael Fonseca; Morie A Gertz; Philip R Greipp; Suzanne R Hayman; Robert A Kyle; Martha Q Lacy; John A Lust; Craig B Reeder; Vivek Roy; Stephen J Russell; Kristen E Detweiler Short; A Keith Stewart; Thomas E Witzig; Steven R Zeldenrust; Robert J Dalton; S Vincent Rajkumar; P Leif Bergsagel
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.