Literature DB >> 16105901

Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies.

Yudi Pawitan1, Karuturi R Krishna Murthy, Stefan Michiels, Alexander Ploner.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: The false discovery rate (FDR) provides a key statistical assessment for microarray studies. Its value depends on the proportion pi(0) of non-differentially expressed (non-DE) genes. In most microarray studies, many genes have small effects not easily separable from non-DE genes. As a result, current methods often overestimate pi(0) and FDR, leading to unnecessary loss of power in the overall analysis.
METHODS: For the common two-sample comparison we derive a natural mixture model of the test statistic and an explicit bias formula in the standard estimation of pi(0). We suggest an improved estimation of pi(0) based on the mixture model and describe a practical likelihood-based procedure for this purpose.
RESULTS: The analysis shows that a large bias occurs when pi(0) is far from 1 and when the non-centrality parameters of the distribution of the test statistic are near zero. The theoretical result also explains substantial discrepancies between non-parametric and model-based estimates of pi(0). Simulation studies indicate mixture-model estimates are less biased than standard estimates. The method is applied to breast cancer and lymphoma data examples. AVAILABILITY: An R-package OCplus containing functions to compute pi(0) based on the mixture model, the resulting FDR and other operating characteristics of microarray data, is freely available at http://www.meb.ki.se/~yudpaw CONTACT: yudi.pawitan@meb.ki.se and alexander.ploner@meb.ki.se.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16105901     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  27 in total

1.  Bias and variance reduction in estimating the proportion of true-null hypotheses.

Authors:  Yebin Cheng; Dexiang Gao; Tiejun Tong
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  PPARγ targeted oral cancer treatment and additional utility of genomics analytic techniques.

Authors:  Nathan Handley; Jacob Eide; Randall Taylor; Beverly Wuertz; Patrick Gaffney; Frank Ondrey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Nickel represses the synthesis of the nickel permease NixA of Helicobacter pylori.

Authors:  Lutz Wolfram; Elvira Haas; Peter Bauerfeind
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Gestational chronodisruption leads to persistent changes in the rat fetal and adult adrenal clock and function.

Authors:  E R Salazar; H G Richter; C Spichiger; N Mendez; D Halabi; K Vergara; I P Alonso; F A Corvalán; C Azpeleta; M Seron-Ferre; C Torres-Farfan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Combining a molecular profile with a clinical and pathological profile: biostatistical considerations.

Authors:  Richard J Sylvester
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl       Date:  2008-09

6.  Global brain gene expression analysis links glutamatergic and GABAergic alterations to suicide and major depression.

Authors:  Adolfo Sequeira; Firoza Mamdani; Carl Ernst; Marquis P Vawter; William E Bunney; Veronique Lebel; Sonia Rehal; Tim Klempan; Alain Gratton; Chawki Benkelfat; Guy A Rouleau; Naguib Mechawar; Gustavo Turecki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A subtype of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia with poor treatment outcome: a genome-wide classification study.

Authors:  Monique L Den Boer; Marjon van Slegtenhorst; Renée X De Menezes; Meyling H Cheok; Jessica G C A M Buijs-Gladdines; Susan T C J M Peters; Laura J C M Van Zutven; H Berna Beverloo; Peter J Van der Spek; Gaby Escherich; Martin A Horstmann; Gritta E Janka-Schaub; Willem A Kamps; William E Evans; Rob Pieters
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  A new multitest correction (SGoF) that increases its statistical power when increasing the number of tests.

Authors:  Antonio Carvajal-Rodríguez; Jacobo de Uña-Alvarez; Emilio Rolán-Alvarez
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  A new test statistic based on shrunken sample variance for identifying differentially expressed genes in small microarray experiments.

Authors:  Akihiro Hirakawa; Yasunori Sato; Chikuma Hamada; Isao Yoshimura
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2008-02-29

10.  Estimating the false discovery rate using mixed normal distribution for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.

Authors:  Akihiro Hirakawa; Yasunori Sato; Takashi Sozu; Chikuma Hamada; Isao Yoshimura
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2008-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.