AIMS: As arrhythmias in the long QT syndrome (LQTS) are triggered by heart rate deceleration or acceleration, we speculated that the sudden bradycardia and subsequent tachycardia that follow adenosine injection would unravel QT changes of diagnostic value in patients with LQTS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (18 LQTS and 20 controls) received intravenous adenosine during sinus rhythm. Adenosine was injected at incremental doses until atrioventricular block or sinus pauses lasting 3 s occurred. The QT duration and morphology were studied at baseline and at the time of maximal bradycardia and subsequent tachycardia. Despite similar degree of adenosine-induced bradycardia (longest R-R 1.7+/-0.7 vs. 2.2+/-1.3 s for LQTS and controls, P=NS), the QT interval of LQT patients increased by 15.8+/-13.1%, whereas the QT of controls increased by only 1.5+/-6.7% (P<0.001). Similarly, despite similar reflex tachycardia (shortest R-R 0.58+/-0.07 vs. 0.55+/-0.07 s for LQT patients and controls, P=NS), LQTS patients developed greater QT prolongation (QTc=569+/-53 vs. 458+/-58 ms for LQT patients and controls, P<0.001). The best discriminator was the QTc during maximal bradycardia. Notched T-waves were observed in 72% of LQT patients but in only 5% of controls during adenosine-induced bradycardia (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: By provoking transient bradycardia followed by sinus tachycardia, this adenosine challenge test triggers QT changes that appear to be useful in distinguishing patients with LQTS from healthy controls.
AIMS: As arrhythmias in the long QT syndrome (LQTS) are triggered by heart rate deceleration or acceleration, we speculated that the sudden bradycardia and subsequent tachycardia that follow adenosine injection would unravel QT changes of diagnostic value in patients with LQTS. METHODS AND RESULTS:Patients (18 LQTS and 20 controls) received intravenous adenosine during sinus rhythm. Adenosine was injected at incremental doses until atrioventricular block or sinus pauses lasting 3 s occurred. The QT duration and morphology were studied at baseline and at the time of maximal bradycardia and subsequent tachycardia. Despite similar degree of adenosine-induced bradycardia (longest R-R 1.7+/-0.7 vs. 2.2+/-1.3 s for LQTS and controls, P=NS), the QT interval of LQT patients increased by 15.8+/-13.1%, whereas the QT of controls increased by only 1.5+/-6.7% (P<0.001). Similarly, despite similar reflex tachycardia (shortest R-R 0.58+/-0.07 vs. 0.55+/-0.07 s for LQT patients and controls, P=NS), LQTS patients developed greater QT prolongation (QTc=569+/-53 vs. 458+/-58 ms for LQT patients and controls, P<0.001). The best discriminator was the QTc during maximal bradycardia. Notched T-waves were observed in 72% of LQT patients but in only 5% of controls during adenosine-induced bradycardia (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: By provoking transient bradycardia followed by sinus tachycardia, this adenosine challenge test triggers QT changes that appear to be useful in distinguishing patients with LQTS from healthy controls.
Authors: F E Cruz Filho; I G Maia; M L Fagundes; R C Barbosa; P A Alves; R M Sá; S H Boghossian; J C Ribeiro Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Arnon Adler; Christian van der Werf; Pieter G Postema; Raphael Rosso; Zahir A Bhuiyan; Jonathan M Kalman; Jitendra K Vohra; Milton E Guevara-Valdivia; Manlio F Marquez; Amir Halkin; Jesaia Benhorin; Charles Antzelevitch; Arthur A M Wilde; Sami Viskin Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Sandro L Yong; Ying Ni; Teng Zhang; David J Tester; Michael J Ackerman; Qing K Wang Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2006-11-14 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Dan Hu; Sami Viskin; Antonio Oliva; Tabitha Carrier; Jonathan M Cordeiro; Hector Barajas-Martinez; Yuesheng Wu; Elena Burashnikov; Serge Sicouri; Ramon Brugada; Rafael Rosso; Alejandra Guerchicoff; Guido D Pollevick; Charles Antzelevitch Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2007-04-10 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Eyal Nof; Hector Barajas-Martinez; Michael Eldar; Janire Urrutia; Gabriel Caceres; Gail Rosenfeld; David Bar-Lev; Micha Feinberg; Elena Burashnikov; Oscar Casis; Dan Hu; Michael Glikson; Charles Antzelevitch Journal: Europace Date: 2011-06-28 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Eyal Nof; Bernard Belhassen; Michael Arad; Zahurul A Bhuiyan; Charles Antzelevitch; Raphael Rosso; Rami Fogelman; David Luria; Dalia El-Ani; Marcel M A M Mannens; Sami Viskin; Michael Eldar; Arthur A M Wilde; Michael Glikson Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2011-05-26 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Dan Hu; Sami Viskin; Antonio Oliva; Jonathan M Cordeiro; Alejandra Guerchicoff; Guido D Pollevick; Charles Antzelevitch Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.438