STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether early evaluation by the anesthesiologist is more beneficial for the ambulatory surgical patient than a day-of-surgery visit. DESIGN: A randomized study evaluating patients with different surgical procedures. SETTING:Ambulatory surgical outpatients at a university-affiliated integrated ambulatory surgical unit. PATIENTS: Sixty-three ASA physical status I and II women scheduled to undergo elective dilatation and curettage or gynecologic laser surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Approximately half of the patients received an early (1 to 7 days preoperative) anesthesia evaluation, and half received a day-of-surgery evaluation. All patients underwent the surgical procedures with a standardized general anesthetic. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The effect of an early versus a day-of-surgery anesthesia visit was evaluated with regard to patient anxiety levels; patient satisfaction with the surgical and anesthetic experience; operating room, recovery room, and ambulatory surgery unit time; anesthetic and analgesic requirements; and frequency of postoperative problems within 72 hours at home. There were no differences between the groups in demographic characteristics, anesthesia or analgesic requirements, degree of satisfaction with the ambulatory surgical experience, time spent in recovery room, or frequency of problems on postoperative follow-up. We were unable to demonstrate any differences between those patients seen early versus those seen on the day of surgery in anxiety levels preoperatively and postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS:Healthy ASA physical status I and II ambulatory surgical patients do not benefit from reducing preoperative anxiety by visiting the anesthesiologist prior to the day of surgery.
RCT Entities:
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether early evaluation by the anesthesiologist is more beneficial for the ambulatory surgical patient than a day-of-surgery visit. DESIGN: A randomized study evaluating patients with different surgical procedures. SETTING: Ambulatory surgical outpatients at a university-affiliated integrated ambulatory surgical unit. PATIENTS: Sixty-three ASA physical status I and II women scheduled to undergo elective dilatation and curettage or gynecologic laser surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Approximately half of the patients received an early (1 to 7 days preoperative) anesthesia evaluation, and half received a day-of-surgery evaluation. All patients underwent the surgical procedures with a standardized general anesthetic. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The effect of an early versus a day-of-surgery anesthesia visit was evaluated with regard to patientanxiety levels; patient satisfaction with the surgical and anesthetic experience; operating room, recovery room, and ambulatory surgery unit time; anesthetic and analgesic requirements; and frequency of postoperative problems within 72 hours at home. There were no differences between the groups in demographic characteristics, anesthesia or analgesic requirements, degree of satisfaction with the ambulatory surgical experience, time spent in recovery room, or frequency of problems on postoperative follow-up. We were unable to demonstrate any differences between those patients seen early versus those seen on the day of surgery in anxiety levels preoperatively and postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Healthy ASA physical status I and II ambulatory surgical patients do not benefit from reducing preoperative anxiety by visiting the anesthesiologist prior to the day of surgery.