PURPOSE: To clinically evaluate the lens haptic plane (LHP) concept in combination with thick-lens ray tracing for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation. SETTING: St. Erik's Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. METHODS: Prospective study of normal cataract cases implanted with Pharmacia CeeOn 809C IOL. Axial length was measured by A-scan. The measured value was first transformed by addition of a constant value to correct for systematic error. Using the transformed axial length and corneal radius measured by keratometry, the LHP position was determined. Knowing the IOL design and the power implanted, expected refractive outcome was calculated and compared to manifest refraction at 6 weeks in terms of mean absolute error (MAE). Thick-lens ray tracing in the paraxial limit was used for the optical calculation. RESULTS: The mean transformed axial length was 23.87 mm. An LHP position algorithm in linear terms of transformed axial length and corneal radius gave an MAE of 0.38 D. There was no trend with axial length. On the present data, the Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T formulas produced MAEs of 0.39 D, 0.39 D, and 0.41 D, respectively, with optimized formula constants. The differences were not statistically significant (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The LHP concept in combination with thick-lens ray tracing achieved MAE comparable to that with currently used formulas. The lack of trend with axial length is important for patients with short and long eyes.
PURPOSE: To clinically evaluate the lens haptic plane (LHP) concept in combination with thick-lens ray tracing for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation. SETTING: St. Erik's Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. METHODS: Prospective study of normal cataract cases implanted with Pharmacia CeeOn 809C IOL. Axial length was measured by A-scan. The measured value was first transformed by addition of a constant value to correct for systematic error. Using the transformed axial length and corneal radius measured by keratometry, the LHP position was determined. Knowing the IOL design and the power implanted, expected refractive outcome was calculated and compared to manifest refraction at 6 weeks in terms of mean absolute error (MAE). Thick-lens ray tracing in the paraxial limit was used for the optical calculation. RESULTS: The mean transformed axial length was 23.87 mm. An LHP position algorithm in linear terms of transformed axial length and corneal radius gave an MAE of 0.38 D. There was no trend with axial length. On the present data, the Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T formulas produced MAEs of 0.39 D, 0.39 D, and 0.41 D, respectively, with optimized formula constants. The differences were not statistically significant (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The LHP concept in combination with thick-lens ray tracing achieved MAE comparable to that with currently used formulas. The lack of trend with axial length is important for patients with short and long eyes.