Literature DB >> 16105565

Antimicrobial activity of tigecycline tested against nosocomial bacterial pathogens from patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit.

Helio S Sader1, Ronald N Jones, Michael J Dowzicky, Thomas R Fritsche.   

Abstract

The antimicrobial activity of tigecycline and selected antimicrobials was evaluated against bacterial pathogens isolated from patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide. A total of 9093 isolates were consecutively collected in >70 medical centers in North America (4157), South America (1830), Europe (3034), and the Asia-Australia (72) areas. The isolates were collected from the bloodstream (68.5%), respiratory tract (13.6%), skin/soft tissue (5.5%), and urinary tract (2.0%) infections in the 2000-2004 period, and susceptibility was tested by reference broth microdilution methods. The most frequently isolated pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (32.1%), Enterococcus spp. (13.7%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 13.0%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8.4%), and Escherichia coli (7.9%). All Gram-positive pathogens (5665) were inhibited at < or =1 microg/mL of tigecycline. Resistance to oxacillin was detected in 43.5% of Staphylococcus aureus and in 85.0% of CoNS, and resistance to vancomycin was observed in 18.6% of enterococci. Tigecycline was very active against Enterobacteriaceae (1876 strains tested) with an MIC90 of < or =1 microg/mL, except for Serratia spp. (2 microg/mL). Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) phenotype was detected in 10% of E. coli and 31% of Klebsiella spp., whereas 28% of Enterobacter spp. were resistant to ceftazidime (AmpC enzyme production). These resistance phenotypes did not adversely affect tigecycline activity. Tigecycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were the most active compounds against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (MIC90, 2 and 1 microg/mL respectively). Tigecycline was also active against Acinetobacter spp. (MIC90, 1 microg/mL), but P. aeruginosa showed decreased susceptibility to tigecycline (MIC90, 16 microg/mL). In summary, isolates from ICU patients worldwide showed high rates of antimicrobial resistance. The most alarming problems detected were vancomycin resistance among enterococci, ESBL-mediated beta-lactam resistance and fluoroquinolone resistance among Enterobacteriaceae, and carbapenem resistance among P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. Tigecycline exhibited potent in vitro activity against most of clinically important pathogenic bacteria (except P. aeruginosa) isolated from ICU patients and may represent an excellent option for the treatment of infections in this clinical environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16105565     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  17 in total

1.  Antimicrobial susceptibilities of a worldwide collection of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates tested against tigecycline and agents commonly used for S. maltophilia infections.

Authors:  David J Farrell; Helio S Sader; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Fatal endocarditis due to extended spectrum betalactamase producing Klebsiella terrigena in a liver transplant recipient.

Authors:  Hannes Goegele; Elfriede Ruttmann; Jaime Aranda-Michel; Reinhold Kafka; Ingrid Stelzmueller; Hans Hausdorfer; Robert Sawyer; Raimund Margreiter; Hugo Bonatti
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 3.  Global challenge of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Federico Perez; Andrea M Hujer; Kristine M Hujer; Brooke K Decker; Philip N Rather; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Bacterial resistance: a sensitive issue complexity of the challenge and containment strategy in Europe.

Authors:  W T M Jansen; J T van der Bruggen; J Verhoef; A C Fluit
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 18.500

5.  Antibiotic administration in the drinking water of mice.

Authors:  James O Marx; Daljit Vudathala; Lisa Murphy; Shelley Rankin; F Claire Hankenson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  Antimicrobial susceptibility among pathogens collected from hospitalized patients in the United States and in vitro activity of tigecycline, a new glycylcycline antimicrobial.

Authors:  Ken B Waites; Lynn B Duffy; Michael J Dowzicky
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  The efflux pump SmeDEF contributes to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

Authors:  María Blanca Sánchez; José Luis Martínez
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Zhangjing Chen; Jufang Wu; Yingyuan Zhang; Junming Wei; Xisheng Leng; Jianwei Bi; Rong Li; Lunan Yan; Zhiwei Quan; Xiaoping Chen; Yunsong Yu; Zhiyong Wu; Dawei Liu; Xiaochun Ma; Robert Maroko; Angel Cooper
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 9.  Tigecycline for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (including carbapenem-resistant) Acinetobacter infections: a review of the scientific evidence.

Authors:  Drosos E Karageorgopoulos; Theodore Kelesidis; Iosif Kelesidis; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Occurrence of tetracycline resistance genes among Escherichia coli isolates from the phase 3 clinical trials for tigecycline.

Authors:  Margareta Tuckman; Peter J Petersen; Anita Y M Howe; Mark Orlowski; Stanley Mullen; Karen Chan; Patricia A Bradford; C Hal Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-07-09       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.