Literature DB >> 16105248

Noise annoyance in Canada.

D S Michaud1, S E Keith, D McMurchy.   

Abstract

The present paper provides the results from two nation-wide telephone surveys conducted in Canada on a representative sample of 5,232 individuals, 15 years of age and older. The goals of this study were to gauge Canadians' annoyance towards environmental noise, identify the source of noise that is viewed as most annoying and quantify annoyance toward this principal noise source according to internationally accepted specifications. The first survey revealed that nearly 8% of Canadians in this age group were either very or extremely bothered, disturbed or annoyed by noise in general and traffic noise was identified as being the most annoying source. A follow-up survey was conducted to further assess Canadians' annoyance towards traffic noise using both a five-item verbal scale and a ten-point numerical scale. It was shown that 6.7% of respondents indicated they were either very or extremely annoyed by traffic noise on the verbal scale. On the numerical scale, where 10 was equivalent to "extremely annoyed" and 0 was equivalent to "not at all annoyed", 5.0% and 9.1% of respondents rated traffic noise as 8 and above and 7 and above, respectively. The national margin of error for these findings is plus or minus 1.9 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. The results are consistent with an approximate value of 7% for the percentage of Canadians, in the age group studied, highly annoyed by road traffic noise (i.e. about 1.8 million people). We found that age, education level and community size had a statistically significant association with noise annoyance ratings in general and annoyance specifically attributed to traffic noise. The use of the International Organization for Standardization/Technical Specification (ISO/TS)-15666 questions for assessing noise annoyance makes it possible to compare our results to other national surveys that have used the same questions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16105248     DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.31634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Noise Health        ISSN: 1463-1741            Impact factor:   0.867


  6 in total

1.  Adverse health effects of industrial wind turbines.

Authors:  Roy D Jeffery; Carmen Krogh; Brett Horner
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Comprehensive approach for the development of traffic noise prediction model for Jaipur city.

Authors:  Sheetal Agarwal; B L Swami
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Adverse health effects of industrial wind turbines.

Authors:  Roy D Jeffery; Carmen Krogh; Brett Horner
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Wind turbines and human health.

Authors:  Loren D Knopper; Christopher A Ollson; Lindsay C McCallum; Melissa L Whitfield Aslund; Robert G Berger; Kathleen Souweine; Mary McDaniel
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2014-06-19

5.  Implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-reported health status and noise annoyance in rural and non-rural Canada.

Authors:  David S Michaud; Leonora Marro; Allison Denning; Shelley Shackleton; Nicolas Toutant; Emily Cameron-Blake; James P McNamee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Are the noise levels acceptable in a built environment like Hong Kong?

Authors:  Wai Ming To; Cheuk Ming Mak; Wai Leung Chung
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.867

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.