Literature DB >> 16103470

A prognostic index for systemic AIDS-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Mark Bower1, Brian Gazzard, Sundhiya Mandalia, Tom Newsom-Davis, Christina Thirlwell, Tony Dhillon, Anne Marie Young, Tom Powles, Andrew Gaya, Mark Nelson, Justin Stebbing.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The established International Prognostic Index for lymphomas has not included patients with systemic AIDS-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
OBJECTIVE: To establish the most appropriate prognostic index for use in patients with systemic AIDS-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
DESIGN: A prospective study involving univariate and multivariable analyses of patients with AIDS-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma whose data were used to examine standard and new criteria for survival after diagnosis.
SETTING: The Chelsea and Westminster cohort of HIV-1-infected persons. PATIENTS: 9621 HIV-positive patients, 111 in whom AIDS-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma was treated after 1996, in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). INTERVENTION: Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to determine the prognostic significance of multiple clinicopathologic variables.
RESULTS: Survival of patients with AIDS-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma has increased in the HAART era (log-rank chi-square, 9.23; P = 0.002). Univariate analyses using the established International Prognostic Index factors of age, tumor stage, lactate dehydrogenase level, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and number of extranodal sites were confirmed to be significant variables. Regression modeling for patients in whom disease was diagnosed after 1996 revealed only 2 independent predictors of death: International Prognostic Index risk group and CD4 cell count. These predictors yielded 4 internally validated risk strata with predicted 1-year survival rates of 82%, 47%, 20%, and 15% (P < 0.001). Prognostic risk scores in the highest quartile yielded a likelihood ratio for death of 7.90 (hazard ratio, 1.0), whereas a prognostic score less than 1.0 yielded a likelihood ratio of 0.23 (hazard ratio, 0.15 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.33]). LIMITATIONS: The sample was small, and different HAART regimens were used.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with AIDS-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma that was diagnosed in the era of HAART, application of the International Prognostic Index remains useful. The addition of CD4 cell count provides further independent prognostic information. Patients who present with AIDS-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma and a low CD4 cell count have a poor prognosis; this information can be used to guide therapeutic options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16103470     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-4-200508160-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  28 in total

1.  Survival of non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients with and without HIV infection in the era of combined antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Chun Chao; Lanfang Xu; Donald Abrams; Wendy Leyden; Michael Horberg; William Towner; Daniel Klein; Beth Tang; Michael Silverberg
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 4.177

2.  Stromal immune infiltration in HIV-related diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is associated with HIV disease history and patient survival.

Authors:  Chun Chao; Lanfang Xu; Michael J Silverberg; Otoniel Martínez-Maza; Lie-Hong Chen; Brandon Castor; Donald I Abrams; Hongbin D Zha; Reina Haque; Jonathan Said
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.177

3.  A new prognostic score for AIDS-related lymphomas in the rituximab-era.

Authors:  Stefan K Barta; Xiaonan Xue; Dan Wang; Jeannette Y Lee; Lawrence D Kaplan; Josep-Maria Ribera; Albert Oriol; Michele Spina; Umberto Tirelli; Francois Boue; Wyndham H Wilson; Christoph Wyen; Kieron Dunleavy; Ariela Noy; Joseph A Sparano
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Outcome in AIDS-related systemic non-Hodgkin lymphoma and leptomeningeal disease is not predicted by a CT brain scan.

Authors:  C L Davies; R Chinn; M Nelson; M Rasanesan; B Gazzard; T Powles; M Bower; J Stebbing
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  The microenvironment of AIDS-related diffuse large B-cell lymphoma provides insight into the pathophysiology and indicates possible therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liapis; Andrew Clear; Andrew Owen; Rita Coutinho; Paul Greaves; Abigail M Lee; Silvia Montoto; Maria Calaminici; John G Gribben
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Predictors of survival after a diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in a resource-limited setting: a retrospective study on the impact of HIV infection and its treatment.

Authors:  Moses H Bateganya; Jeffrey Stanaway; Paula E Brentlinger; Amalia S Magaret; Anna Wald; Jackson Orem; Corey Casper
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 7.  Changes in the influence of lymphoma- and HIV-specific factors on outcomes in AIDS-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  S K Barta; M S Samuel; X Xue; D Wang; J Y Lee; N Mounier; J-M Ribera; M Spina; U Tirelli; R Weiss; L Galicier; F Boue; R F Little; K Dunleavy; W H Wilson; C Wyen; S C Remick; L D Kaplan; L Ratner; A Noy; J A Sparano
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Dose-reduced busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and autologous stem cell transplantation for human immunodeficiency virus-associated lymphoma: AIDS Malignancy Consortium study 020.

Authors:  Thomas R Spitzer; Richard F Ambinder; Jeannette Y Lee; Lawrence D Kaplan; William Wachsman; David J Straus; David M Aboulafia; David T Scadden
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a review.

Authors:  Susan Mallett; Patrick Royston; Susan Dutton; Rachel Waters; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 10.  Reporting performance of prognostic models in cancer: a review.

Authors:  Susan Mallett; Patrick Royston; Rachel Waters; Susan Dutton; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.