Literature DB >> 16102881

Sociodemographic and attitudinal correlates of cervical screening uptake in a national sample of women in Britain.

Stephen Sutton1, Celia Rutherford.   

Abstract

Sociodemographic and attitudinal correlates of self-reported cervical screening uptake were investigated among 1307 women in the target age group who participated in two national surveys conducted in Britain in 1999. Evidence for inequalities in screening uptake was mixed. Of the socioeconomic indicators, only age of completed full-time education showed a significant effect in the multivariate analysis. The strong effects of car ownership and housing tenure in the univariate analyses were eliminated by controlling for marital status, which showed a robust association with uptake. Uptake was highest among married and separated women and lowest among single and widowed women. There was no evidence that the effects of marital status and education were mediated by the attitudinal variables. Anticipated embarrassment and attitudes to screening (e.g., "There's no point going for screening if you don't have any symptoms") were significant independent predictors of uptake. These findings suggest that information campaigns need to address feelings of embarrassment and lack of understanding of the rationale for screening and that efforts should be made to encourage single and widowed women to attend.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16102881     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  25 in total

1.  Decomposing income-related inequality in cervical screening in 67 countries.

Authors:  Brittany McKinnon; Sam Harper; Spencer Moore
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Time orientation and health-related behaviour: measurement in general population samples.

Authors:  Rachel A Crockett; John Weinman; Matthew Hankins; Theresa Marteau
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2009-03

3.  Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening and Associated Factors Among 15-49-Year-Old Women in Dessie Town, Northeast Ethiopia.

Authors:  Fasika Tefera; Israel Mitiku
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  High-Risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infection and Cervical Cancer Prevention in Britain: Evidence of Differential Uptake of Interventions from a Probability Survey.

Authors:  Clare Tanton; Kate Soldan; Simon Beddows; Catherine H Mercer; Jo Waller; Nigel Field; Soazig Clifton; Andrew J Copas; Kavita Panwar; Precious Manyenga; Filomeno da Silva; Kaye Wellings; Catherine A Ison; Anne M Johnson; Pam Sonnenberg
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Using record linkage to monitor equity and variation in screening programmes.

Authors:  Dermot O'Reilly; Heather Kinnear; Michael Rosato; Adrian Mairs; Clare Hall
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Increasing rates of cervical cancer in young women in England: an analysis of national data 1982-2006.

Authors:  G Foley; R Alston; M Geraci; L Brabin; H Kitchener; J Birch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Personal factors influence use of cervical cancer screening services: epidemiological survey and linked administrative data address the limitations of previous research.

Authors:  Sarah C Olesen; Peter Butterworth; Patricia Jacomb; Robert J Tait
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Variation in incidence of breast, lung and cervical cancer and malignant melanoma of skin by socioeconomic group in England.

Authors:  Lorraine Shack; Catrina Jordan; Catherine S Thomson; Vivian Mak; Henrik Møller
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in Great Britain: analysis of cross sectional survey data.

Authors:  Kath Moser; Julietta Patnick; Valerie Beral
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-16

10.  Social patterning of screening uptake and the impact of facilitating informed choices: psychological and ethical analyses.

Authors:  Rachel Crockett; Timothy M Wilkinson; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.