Literature DB >> 16102683

Propofol concentration requirement for laryngeal mask airway insertion was highest with the ProSeal, next highest with the Fastrach, and lowest with the Classic type, with target-controlled infusion.

Fumi Handa-Tsutsui1, Mitsuharu Kodaka.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine propofol concentration of plasma 50% (Cp50, concentration at which there is a 50% chance that patients show no movement in response) for the Classic-, Fastrach-, and ProSeal-type laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion using target-controlled infusion (TCI) technique.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, comparative study.
SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II women scheduled for minor gynecologic operations.
INTERVENTIONS: Propofol TCI (Diprifusor pharmacokinetic model) was started at target concentration using an anesthesia pump. After reaching target effect-site concentration of propofol, 1 of the 3 types of LMA was inserted. We recorded patient responses to LMA insertion as "movement" or "no movement." Test propofol concentrations started from a dosage of 4 microg/mL. Concentrations were then predetermined by a modified Dixon's up-and-down method with 0.4 microg/mL step size. MEASUREMENTS: Patient response to LMA insertion was classified as either of "no movement" or "movement." The midpoint was defined as the average concentration value of crossover (movement/no movement) response. The Cp50 value was defined as the average of the crossover midpoints in each group, and it was estimated from calculating the midpoints. MAIN
RESULTS: Cp50 of the Classic, Fastrach, and ProSeal LMA insertion were 3.2+/-0.34, 4.0+/-0.22, and 4.9+/-0.20 microg/mL (mean+/-SD), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Required propofol TCI concentrations for LMA insertion were significantly highest for the ProSeal, second highest for the Fastrach, and lowest for the Classic LMA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16102683     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  7 in total

1.  Supraglottic Airway Devices: the Search for the Best Insertion Technique or the Time to Change Our Point of View?

Authors:  Massimiliano Sorbello; Flavia Petrini
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-04-01

2.  Comparison of effects of propofol and ketamine-propofol mixture (ketofol) on laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions and hemodynamics in elderly patients: a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial.

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Erdogan; Zekine Begec; Mustafa Said Aydogan; Ulku Ozgul; Aytac Yucel; Cemil Colak; Mahmut Durmus
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Propofol preferentially relaxes neurokinin receptor-2-induced airway smooth muscle contraction in guinea pig trachea.

Authors:  Neil R Gleason; George Gallos; Yi Zhang; Charles W Emala
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Low dose of fentanyl reduces predicted effect-site concentration of propofol for flexible laryngeal mask airway insertion.

Authors:  Junko Yumura; Yoshihiko Koukita; Ken-ichi Fukuda; Yuzuru Kaneko; Tatsuya Ichinohe
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Endogenous gamma-aminobutyric acid modulates tonic guinea pig airway tone and propofol-induced airway smooth muscle relaxation.

Authors:  George Gallos; Neil R Gleason; Laszlo Virag; Yi Zhang; Kentaro Mizuta; Robert A Whittington; Charles W Emala
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Effect-site concentration of propofol required for LMA-Supreme™ insertion with and without remifentanil: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Matilde Zaballos; Emilia Bastida; Salomé Agustí; Maite Portas; Consuelo Jiménez; Maite López-Gil
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Dexmedetomidine with propofol versus fentanyl with propofol for insertion of Proseal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, double-blinded clinical trial.

Authors:  Jaya Choudhary; Aaditya Prabhudesai; Chumki Datta
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.