Fumi Handa-Tsutsui1, Mitsuharu Kodaka. 1. Department of Anesthesia, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical School, Saitama 350-8550, Japan. pxn01110@nifty.com
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine propofol concentration of plasma 50% (Cp50, concentration at which there is a 50% chance that patients show no movement in response) for the Classic-, Fastrach-, and ProSeal-type laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion using target-controlled infusion (TCI) technique. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, comparative study. SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II women scheduled for minor gynecologic operations. INTERVENTIONS:Propofol TCI (Diprifusor pharmacokinetic model) was started at target concentration using an anesthesia pump. After reaching target effect-site concentration of propofol, 1 of the 3 types of LMA was inserted. We recorded patient responses to LMA insertion as "movement" or "no movement." Test propofol concentrations started from a dosage of 4 microg/mL. Concentrations were then predetermined by a modified Dixon's up-and-down method with 0.4 microg/mL step size. MEASUREMENTS: Patient response to LMA insertion was classified as either of "no movement" or "movement." The midpoint was defined as the average concentration value of crossover (movement/no movement) response. The Cp50 value was defined as the average of the crossover midpoints in each group, and it was estimated from calculating the midpoints. MAIN RESULTS: Cp50 of the Classic, Fastrach, and ProSeal LMA insertion were 3.2+/-0.34, 4.0+/-0.22, and 4.9+/-0.20 microg/mL (mean+/-SD), respectively. CONCLUSION: Required propofol TCI concentrations for LMA insertion were significantly highest for the ProSeal, second highest for the Fastrach, and lowest for the Classic LMA.
RCT Entities:
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine propofol concentration of plasma 50% (Cp50, concentration at which there is a 50% chance that patients show no movement in response) for the Classic-, Fastrach-, and ProSeal-type laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion using target-controlled infusion (TCI) technique. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, comparative study. SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II women scheduled for minor gynecologic operations. INTERVENTIONS:PropofolTCI (Diprifusor pharmacokinetic model) was started at target concentration using an anesthesia pump. After reaching target effect-site concentration of propofol, 1 of the 3 types of LMA was inserted. We recorded patient responses to LMA insertion as "movement" or "no movement." Test propofol concentrations started from a dosage of 4 microg/mL. Concentrations were then predetermined by a modified Dixon's up-and-down method with 0.4 microg/mL step size. MEASUREMENTS: Patient response to LMA insertion was classified as either of "no movement" or "movement." The midpoint was defined as the average concentration value of crossover (movement/no movement) response. The Cp50 value was defined as the average of the crossover midpoints in each group, and it was estimated from calculating the midpoints. MAIN RESULTS: Cp50 of the Classic, Fastrach, and ProSeal LMA insertion were 3.2+/-0.34, 4.0+/-0.22, and 4.9+/-0.20 microg/mL (mean+/-SD), respectively. CONCLUSION: Required propofolTCI concentrations for LMA insertion were significantly highest for the ProSeal, second highest for the Fastrach, and lowest for the Classic LMA.
Authors: Mehmet Ali Erdogan; Zekine Begec; Mustafa Said Aydogan; Ulku Ozgul; Aytac Yucel; Cemil Colak; Mahmut Durmus Journal: J Anesth Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 2.078
Authors: George Gallos; Neil R Gleason; Laszlo Virag; Yi Zhang; Kentaro Mizuta; Robert A Whittington; Charles W Emala Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 7.892