BACKGROUND: Behavioural sleep problems in young children are relatively common with between 20% and 40% of those aged 1 to 5 years being affected. This paper describes the development of a simple questionnaire to assess disorders of initiating and maintaining sleep (DIMS) in children aged between 1 and 5 years for use as a selection tool for research purposes or as a screening instrument in primary care. METHODS: A subsection of the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children was adapted and piloted with a small sample of children in two inner city GP practices (n = 81). Face and content validity were initially established by expert review. Discriminant validity was assessed qualitatively using interviews with mothers of identified cases and non-cases. The validity of the cut-off score was assessed by blinded case note reviews off known cases; inter-rater reliability was also calculated. Following modifications, the final questionnaire was posted to a representative sample of parents across the region with children in the appropriate age band (n = 1023). Internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and factor analysis was undertaken to identify significant factors within the questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate to the population questionnaire was 61.5% (n = 628) with 218 of the children having sleep scores that were indicative of DIMS (35%), echoing other figures reported in the literature. There was good internal consistency for the items (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85) with two main factors accounting for 58% of the variance. CONCLUSION: The Tayside Children's Sleep Questionnaire (TCSQ) is an easy-to-read and reliable tool that could be used both as a clinical and research instrument to assess the severity and prevalence of DIMS in young children.
BACKGROUND: Behavioural sleep problems in young children are relatively common with between 20% and 40% of those aged 1 to 5 years being affected. This paper describes the development of a simple questionnaire to assess disorders of initiating and maintaining sleep (DIMS) in children aged between 1 and 5 years for use as a selection tool for research purposes or as a screening instrument in primary care. METHODS: A subsection of the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children was adapted and piloted with a small sample of children in two inner city GP practices (n = 81). Face and content validity were initially established by expert review. Discriminant validity was assessed qualitatively using interviews with mothers of identified cases and non-cases. The validity of the cut-off score was assessed by blinded case note reviews off known cases; inter-rater reliability was also calculated. Following modifications, the final questionnaire was posted to a representative sample of parents across the region with children in the appropriate age band (n = 1023). Internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and factor analysis was undertaken to identify significant factors within the questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate to the population questionnaire was 61.5% (n = 628) with 218 of the children having sleep scores that were indicative of DIMS (35%), echoing other figures reported in the literature. There was good internal consistency for the items (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85) with two main factors accounting for 58% of the variance. CONCLUSION: The Tayside Children's Sleep Questionnaire (TCSQ) is an easy-to-read and reliable tool that could be used both as a clinical and research instrument to assess the severity and prevalence of DIMS in young children.
Authors: M J Mulcahey; L C Vogel; M Sheikh; J C Arango-Lasprilla; M Augutis; E Garner; E M Hagen; L B Jakeman; E Kelly; R Martin; J Odenkirchen; A Scheel-Sailer; J Schottler; H Taylor; C C Thielen; K Zebracki Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Kimberly A Rhoades; Leslie D Leve; Gordon T Harold; Anne M Mannering; Jenae M Neiderhiser; Daniel S Shaw; Misaki N Natsuaki; David Reiss Journal: J Fam Psychol Date: 2012-08
Authors: Candice A Alfano; Victoria C Smith; Katharine C Reynolds; Radhika Reddy; Lea R Dougherty Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2013-11-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Courtney K Blackwell; Lauren E Hartstein; Amy J Elliott; Christopher B Forrest; Jody Ganiban; Kelly J Hunt; Carlos A Camargo; Monique K LeBourgeois Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 4.147