Literature DB >> 16101620

Multicenter, prospective, randomized safety and efficacy study of a new atrial-based managed ventricular pacing mode (MVP) in dual chamber ICDs.

Michael O Sweeney1, Kenneth A Ellenbogen, David Casavant, Robert Betzold, Todd Sheldon, Feng Tang, Megan Mueller, John Lingle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ventricular desynchronization caused by right ventricular pacing may impair ventricular function and increase risk of heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation (AF), and death. Conventional DDD/R mode often results in high cumulative percentage ventricular pacing (Cum%VP). We hypothesized that a new managed ventricular pacing mode (MVP) would safely provide AAI/R pacing with ventricular monitoring and DDD/R during AV block (AVB) and reduce Cum%VP compared to DDD/R.
METHODS: MVP RAMware was downloaded in 181 patients with Marquis DR ICDs. Patients were initially randomized to either MVP or DDD/R for 1 month, then crossed over to the opposite mode for 1 month. ICD diagnostics were analyzed for cumulative percentage atrial pacing (Cum%AP), Cum%VP, and duration of DDD/R pacing for spontaneous AVB.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics included age 66 +/- 12 years, EF 36 +/- 14%, and NYHA Class II-III 36%. Baseline PR interval was 190 +/- 53 msec and programmed AV intervals (DDD/R) were 216 +/- 50 (paced)/189 +/- 53 (sensed) msec. Mean Cum%VP was significantly lower in MVP versus DDD/R (4.1 +/- 16.3 vs 73.8 +/- 32.5, P < 0.0001). The median absolute and relative reductions in Cum%VP during MVP were 85.0 and 99.9, respectively. Mean Cum%AP was not different between MVP versus DDD/R (48.7 +/- 38.5 vs 47.3 +/- 38.4, P = 0.83). During MVP overall time spent in AAI/R was 89.6% (intrinsic conduction), DDD/R 6.7% (intermittent AVB), and DDI/R 3.7% (AF). No adverse events were attributed to MVP.
CONCLUSIONS: MVP safely achieves functional atrial pacing by limiting ventricular pacing to periods of intermittent AVB and AF in ICD patients, significantly reducing Cum%VP compared to DDD/R. MVP is a universal pacing mode that adapts to AVB and AF, providing both atrial pacing and ventricular pacing support when needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16101620     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.40766.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  20 in total

1.  Minimizing right ventricular pacing in pacemaker patients with intact and compromised atrioventricular conduction : Results from the EVITA Trial.

Authors:  A Bauer; J Vermeulen; L Toivonen; J Voitk; C Barr; P Peytchev
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2015-08-28

2.  Permanent direct his bundle pacing does not induce ventricular dyssynchrony unlike conventional right ventricular apical pacing. An intrapatient acute comparison study.

Authors:  Domenico Catanzariti; Massimiliano Maines; Claudio Cemin; Gianpaolo Broso; Tiziana Marotta; Giuseppe Vergara
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Future easy and physiological cardiac pacing.

Authors:  Eraldo Occhetta; Miriam Bortnik; Paolo Marino
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2011-01-26

Review 4.  New concepts in physiologic cardiac pacing.

Authors:  Dwight W Reynolds; Christina M Murray
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  The importance of avoiding unnecessary right ventricular pacing in clinical practice.

Authors:  Finn Akerström; Miguel A Arias; Marta Pachón; Jesús Jiménez-López; Alberto Puchol; Justo Juliá-Calvo
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-26

Review 6.  Controversies in pacing: indications and programming.

Authors:  Anne M Gillis; Rik Willems
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Reduction of right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction through programming a long atrioventricular delay along with the DDIR mode.

Authors:  Aischa Nitardy; Holger Langreck; Rainer Dietz; Martin Stockburger
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  Potential prevention of pacing-induced heart failure using simple pacemaker programming algorithm.

Authors:  Tomasz Chwyczko; Rafał Dąbrowski; Aleksander Maciąg; Maciej Sterliński; Edyta Smolis-Bąk; Anna Borowiec; Ilona Kowalik; Andrada Łabęcka; Agnieszka Jankowska; Marek Kośmicki; Jadwiga Janas; Mariusz Pytkowski; Hanna Szwed
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 1.468

9.  Difference in percentage of ventricular pacing between two algorithms for minimizing ventricular pacing: results of the IDEAL RVP (Identify the Best Algorithm for Reducing Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing) study.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Murakami; Naoya Tsuboi; Yasuya Inden; Yukihiko Yoshida; Toyoaki Murohara; Zenichi Ihara; Mitsuaki Takami
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Ventricular pacing: to pace or not to pace.

Authors:  Paul A Levine
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.