Literature DB >> 16101594

Current strategies for the reduction of maternal mortality.

Colin Bullough1, Nicolas Meda, Krystyna Makowiecka, Carine Ronsmans, Endang L Achadi, Julia Hussein.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review current strategies for the reduction of maternal mortality and the evidence pertinent to these strategies. Historical, contextual and current literature were examined to identify the evidence base upon which recommendations on current strategies to reduce maternal mortality are made. Current safe motherhood strategies are designed based mostly on low grade evidence which is historical and observational, as well as on experience and a process of deductive reasoning. Safe motherhood strategies are complex public health approaches which are different from single clinical interventions. The approach to evidence used for clinical decision making needs to be reconsidered to fit with the practicalities of research on the effectiveness of strategies at the population level. It is unlikely that any single strategy will be optimal for different situations. Strengthening of the knowledge base on the effectiveness of public health strategies to reduce maternal mortality is urgently required but will need concerted action and international commitment.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16101594     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00718.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  43 in total

1.  Collapsing the vertical-horizontal divide: an ethnographic study of evidence-based policymaking in maternal health.

Authors:  Dominique P Béhague; Katerini T Storeng
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Ethics in public health research: minding the gaps: a reassessment of the challenges to safe motherhood.

Authors:  Wendy J Graham; Julia Hussein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Increasing institutional deliveries among antenatal clients: effect of birth preparedness counselling.

Authors:  Dieudonné Soubeiga; Drissa Sia; Lise Gauvin
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.344

4.  Skilled birth attendants in Tanzania: a descriptive study of cadres and emergency obstetric care signal functions performed.

Authors:  Etsuko Ueno; Adetoro A Adegoke; Gileard Masenga; Janeth Fimbo; Sia E Msuya
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-01

5.  What post-abortion care indicators don't measure: Global abortion politics and obstetric practice in Senegal.

Authors:  Siri Suh
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 6.  Perinatal interventions and survival in resource-poor settings: which work, which don't, which have the jury out?

Authors:  David Osrin; Audrey Prost
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  A cost-effectiveness study of caesarean-section deliveries by clinical officers, general practitioners and obstetricians in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Sennen H Hounton; David Newlands; Nicolas Meda; Vincent De Brouwere
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2009-04-16

8.  Antenatal and delivery care in rural western Kenya: the effect of training health care workers to provide "focused antenatal care".

Authors:  Peter O Ouma; Anna M van Eijk; Mary J Hamel; Evallyne S Sikuku; Frank O Odhiambo; Kaendi M Munguti; John G Ayisi; Sara B Crawford; Piet A Kager; Laurence Slutsker
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.223

9.  Metrics of Survival: Post-Abortion Care and Reproductive Rights in Senegal.

Authors:  Siri Suh
Journal:  Med Anthropol       Date:  2018-08-13

10.  Improving quality of care for maternal and newborn health: prospective pilot study of the WHO safe childbirth checklist program.

Authors:  Jonathan M Spector; Priya Agrawal; Bhala Kodkany; Stuart Lipsitz; Angela Lashoher; Gerald Dziekan; Rajiv Bahl; Mario Merialdi; Matthews Mathai; Claire Lemer; Atul Gawande
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.