V Anderson1, C Catroppa. 1. University of Melbourne, Australia. v.anderson@psych.unimelb.edu.au
Abstract
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: Disruptions to executive function (EF) may occur as a result of traumatic brain injury (TBI), in the context of direct damage to frontal regions or in association with disruption of connections between these areas and other brain regions. Little investigation of EF has occurred following TBI during childhood and there is little evidence of possible recovery trajectories in the years post-injury. The present study aimed to (i) examine whether a dose-response relationship exists between injury severity and EF; (ii) document recovery of EF in the 2 years post-injury and (iii) determine any additional predictors of outcome in the domain of EF. RESEARCH DESIGN: The study employed a prospective, longitudinal design, with participants recruited at time of injury and followed over a 2-year period. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: The study examined EF in a group of 69 children who had sustained a mild, moderate or severe TBI. Four components of EF were assessed: (i) attentional control; (ii) planning, goal setting and problem solving; (iii) cognitive flexibility; and (iv) abstract reasoning. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Results showed that, while children with severe TBI performed most poorly during the acute stage post-injury, they exhibited greatest recovery of EF over a 24-month period. Regardless, functional deficits remained most severe for this group 2 years post-injury. Results demonstrated the multi-dimensional nature of EF and the differential recovery of skills, following childhood TBI. Pre-injury ability and age at injury were identified as significant predictors of EF and functional skills. CONCLUSIONS: Children sustaining severe TBI at a young age are particularly vulnerable to impairments in EF. While these difficulties do show some recovery with time since injury, long-term deficits remain and may impact on ongoing development.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: Disruptions to executive function (EF) may occur as a result of traumatic brain injury (TBI), in the context of direct damage to frontal regions or in association with disruption of connections between these areas and other brain regions. Little investigation of EF has occurred following TBI during childhood and there is little evidence of possible recovery trajectories in the years post-injury. The present study aimed to (i) examine whether a dose-response relationship exists between injury severity and EF; (ii) document recovery of EF in the 2 years post-injury and (iii) determine any additional predictors of outcome in the domain of EF. RESEARCH DESIGN: The study employed a prospective, longitudinal design, with participants recruited at time of injury and followed over a 2-year period. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: The study examined EF in a group of 69 children who had sustained a mild, moderate or severe TBI. Four components of EF were assessed: (i) attentional control; (ii) planning, goal setting and problem solving; (iii) cognitive flexibility; and (iv) abstract reasoning. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Results showed that, while children with severe TBI performed most poorly during the acute stage post-injury, they exhibited greatest recovery of EF over a 24-month period. Regardless, functional deficits remained most severe for this group 2 years post-injury. Results demonstrated the multi-dimensional nature of EF and the differential recovery of skills, following childhood TBI. Pre-injury ability and age at injury were identified as significant predictors of EF and functional skills. CONCLUSIONS:Children sustaining severe TBI at a young age are particularly vulnerable to impairments in EF. While these difficulties do show some recovery with time since injury, long-term deficits remain and may impact on ongoing development.
Authors: Chad P Johnson; Jenifer Juranek; Larry A Kramer; Mary R Prasad; Paul R Swank; Linda Ewing-Cobbs Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Anne Maillard-Wermelinger; Keith Owen Yeates; H Gerry Taylor; Jerome Rusin; Barbara Bangert; Ann Dietrich; Kathryn Nuss; Martha Wright Journal: Dev Neurorehabil Date: 2009 Impact factor: 2.308
Authors: Pinki K Prasad; Kristina K Hardy; Nan Zhang; Kim Edelstein; Deokumar Srivastava; Lonnie Zeltzer; Marilyn Stovall; Nita L Seibel; Wendy Leisenring; Gregory T Armstrong; Leslie L Robison; Kevin Krull Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-07-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Brad G Kurowski; H Gerry Taylor; Keith Owen Yeates; Nicolay C Walz; Terry Stancin; Shari L Wade Journal: PM R Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Terry Stancin; Shari L Wade; Nicolay C Walz; Keith Owen Yeates; H Gerry Taylor Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: Daniel C Krawczyk; Gerri Hanten; Elisabeth A Wilde; Xiaoqi Li; Kathleen P Schnelle; Tricia L Merkley; Ana C Vasquez; Lori G Cook; Michelle McClelland; Sandra B Chapman; Harvey S Levin Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 3.169