OBJECTIVE: To present the internal validation of the quality of life (QOL) evaluation scale for patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and their caregivers/family members, proposed by Logsdon et al. METHOD: The scale was adapted through translation, back translation and equivalence evaluation. The Portuguese version was administered to a sample of 40 patients with mild to moderate AD according to NINCDS ADRDA and DSM-III-R criteria, and also to their respective caregivers/family members. RESULTS: The reliability of the instrument was excellent, both in the intra and the inter-examiner test-retest. The correlation coefficients for the intra-examiner assessment were 0.87/0.95/0.95 (p < 0.001)) for the patient, family and caregiver versions, respectively. The correlation coefficients for the inter-examiner assessment were 0.76/0.96/0.93 (p < 0.001) for the patients, family and caregiver versions, respectively. The reliability was excellent for both the patient and the relatives' versions in relation to the patient's QOL (alpha = 0.81 and 0.85, respectively), and also in relation to the caregiver's QOL (alpha = 0.84). CONCLUSION: The adapted version of the instrument proved to be straightforward and brief, presenting excellent stability and reliability. The Portuguese version can be obtained by contacting the first author.
OBJECTIVE: To present the internal validation of the quality of life (QOL) evaluation scale for patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and their caregivers/family members, proposed by Logsdon et al. METHOD: The scale was adapted through translation, back translation and equivalence evaluation. The Portuguese version was administered to a sample of 40 patients with mild to moderate AD according to NINCDS ADRDA and DSM-III-R criteria, and also to their respective caregivers/family members. RESULTS: The reliability of the instrument was excellent, both in the intra and the inter-examiner test-retest. The correlation coefficients for the intra-examiner assessment were 0.87/0.95/0.95 (p < 0.001)) for the patient, family and caregiver versions, respectively. The correlation coefficients for the inter-examiner assessment were 0.76/0.96/0.93 (p < 0.001) for the patients, family and caregiver versions, respectively. The reliability was excellent for both the patient and the relatives' versions in relation to the patient's QOL (alpha = 0.81 and 0.85, respectively), and also in relation to the caregiver's QOL (alpha = 0.84). CONCLUSION: The adapted version of the instrument proved to be straightforward and brief, presenting excellent stability and reliability. The Portuguese version can be obtained by contacting the first author.
Authors: Luciane F Viola; Paula V Nunes; Monica S Yassuda; Ivan Aprahamian; Franklin S Santos; Glenda D Santos; Paula S Brum; Sheila M Borges; Alexandra M Oliveira; Gisele F S Chaves; Eliane C Ciasca; Rita C R Ferreira; Vanessa J R de Paula; Oswaldo H Takeda; Roberta M Mirandez; Ricky Watari; Deusivania V S Falcao; Meire Cachioni; Orestes V Forlenza Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2011 Impact factor: 2.365