Literature DB >> 16100307

Incidence of shoulder and neck pain in a working population: effect modification between mechanical and psychosocial exposures at work? Results from a one year follow up of the Malmö shoulder and neck study cohort.

Per-Olof Ostergren1, Bertil S Hanson, Istvan Balogh, John Ektor-Andersen, Agneta Isacsson, Palle Orbaek, Jörgen Winkel, Sven-Olof Isacsson.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of mechanical exposure and work related psychosocial factors on shoulder and neck pain.
DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: 4919 randomly chosen, vocationally active men and women ages 45-65 residing in a Swedish city. Neck and shoulder pain were determined by the standardised Nordic questionnaire. Mechanical exposure was assessed by an index based on 11 items designed and evaluated for shoulder and neck disorders. Work related psychosocial factors were measured by the Karasek and Theorell demand-control instrument. MAIN
RESULTS: High mechanical exposure was associated with heightened risk for shoulder and neck pain among men and women during follow up. Age adjusted odds ratios (OR) were 2.17 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.65, 2.85) and 1.59 (95% CI: 1.22, 2.06), respectively. In women, job strain (high psychological job demands and low job decision latitude) correlated with heightened risk (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.29, 2.31). These risk estimates remained statistically significant when controlled for high mechanical exposure regarding job strain (and vice versa), and for sociodemographic factors. Testing for effect modification between high mechanical exposure and job strain showed them acting synergistically only in women.
CONCLUSION: Job related mechanical exposure in both sexes, and psychosocial factors in women, seem independently of each other to play a part for development of shoulder and neck pain in vocationally active people. The effect of psychosocial factors was more prominent in women, which could be the result of biological factors as well as gender issues. These results suggest that interventions aiming at reducing the occurrence of shoulder and neck pain should include both mechanical and psychosocial factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16100307      PMCID: PMC1733134          DOI: 10.1136/jech.2005.034801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  39 in total

Review 1.  Physical risk factors for neck pain.

Authors:  G A Ariëns; W van Mechelen; P M Bongers; L M Bouter; G van der Wal
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.024

2.  Risk factors for neck and shoulder disorders: a nested case-control study covering a 24-year period.

Authors:  K Fredriksson; L Alfredsson; C B Thorbjörnsson; L Punnett; A Toomingas; M Torgén; A Kilbom
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  The scientific basis for making guidelines and standards to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  E R Viikari-Juntura
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Cross-sectional study of risk factors for symptoms in the neck and shoulder area.

Authors:  K Ekberg; M Karlsson; O Axelson; P Malm
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Musculoskeletal pain and smoking in Norway.

Authors:  S Brage; T Bjerkedal
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Associations between self-rated psychosocial work conditions and musculoskeletal symptoms and signs. Stockholm MUSIC I Study Group.

Authors:  A Toomingas; T Theorell; H Michélsen; R Nordemar
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.024

7.  Prevalence, determinants, and consequences of chronic neck pain in Finland.

Authors:  M Mäkelä; M Heliövaara; K Sievers; O Impivaara; P Knekt; A Aromaa
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  The Malmo Diet and Cancer Study. Design and feasibility.

Authors:  G Berglund; S Elmstähl; L Janzon; S A Larsson
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 9.  Occupational back pain--an unhelpful polemic.

Authors:  J W Frank; I R Pulcins; M S Kerr; H S Shannon; S A Stansfeld
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.024

10.  Mechanical and psychosocial factors predict new onset shoulder pain: a prospective cohort study of newly employed workers.

Authors:  E F Harkness; G J Macfarlane; E S Nahit; A J Silman; J McBeth
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.402

View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of work related neck and upper limb problems: psychosocial and personal risk factors (part I) and effective interventions from a bio behavioural perspective (part II).

Authors:  P M Bongers; S Ijmker; S van den Heuvel; B M Blatter
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-09

Review 2.  The incremental effect of psychosocial workplace factors on the development of neck and shoulder disorders: a systematic review of longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Silvia Kraatz; Jessica Lang; Thomas Kraus; Eva Münster; Elke Ochsmann
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Can high psychological job demands, low decision latitude, and high job strain predict disability pensions? A 12-year follow-up of middle-aged Swedish workers.

Authors:  Catarina Canivet; BongKyoo Choi; Robert Karasek; Mahnaz Moghaddassi; Carin Staland-Nyman; Per-Olof Östergren
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Discharge behaviors of trapezius motor units during exposure to low and high levels of acute psychosocial stress.

Authors:  Jennifer L Stephenson; Katrina S Maluf
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.177

5.  Work-related psychosocial and mechanical risk factors for neck/shoulder pain: a 3-year follow-up study of the general working population in Norway.

Authors:  Tom Sterud; Håkon A Johannessen; Tore Tynes
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Insomnia symptoms, sleep duration, and disability pensions: a prospective study of Swedish workers.

Authors:  Catarina Canivet; Carin Staland-Nyman; Sara I Lindeberg; Robert Karasek; Mahnaz Moghaddassi; Per-Olof Östergren
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-04

7.  The relationship between upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms attributed to work and risk factors in office workers.

Authors:  Prawit Janwantanakul; Praneet Pensri; Wiroj Jiamjarasrangsi; Thanes Sinsongsook
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  The comparison of the empty can and full can techniques and a new diagonal horizontal adduction test for supraspinatus muscle testing using cross-sectional analysis through ultrasonography.

Authors:  Steven W Forbush; Douglas M White; Wayne Smith
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-06

9.  The prevalence of work-related stress, and its association with self-perceived health and sick-leave, in a population of employed Swedish women.

Authors:  Kristina Holmgren; Synneve Dahlin-Ivanoff; Cecilia Björkelund; Gunnel Hensing
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Musculoskeletal disorders among cosmetologists.

Authors:  Alexandra Tsigonia; Dimitra Tanagra; Athena Linos; Georgios Merekoulias; Evangelos C Alexopoulos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.