BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Shade or inadequate water can inhibit photosynthesis and limit the development of maize (Zea mays) ovaries around the time of pollination, potentially reducing the number of kernels at harvest. This study investigated whether the decreased photosynthesis diminished only the sugar supply or also altered the transport path to the ovaries. METHODS: Photosynthesis and water potentials (Psiw) were measured in the leaves while dry matter delivery was monitored in the ovaries. Ovary glucose, starch and acid invertase activities were measured in situ. Stems were fed xylem-mobile safranin or phloem-mobile carboxyfluorescein (CF), and the dye transport to the ovaries was determined. KEY RESULTS: Under normal conditions, the ovaries gained in dry mass, and starch accumulated in the pedicel and ovary wall. Glucose accumulated in the pedicel, apparently in the apoplast where insoluble (cell-wall-bound) acid invertase acted on the arriving sucrose. A glucose gradient developed from pedicel to nucellus. Safranin moved in the xylem and did not reach the ovary, but CF moved in the phloem and arrived at the ovary. CF also spread into the pedicel but unlike glucose it did not enter the nucellus. Low Psiw or shade decreased leaf photosynthesis, ovary dry mass accumulation, invertase activities, pedicel glucose, starch accumulation and CF delivery. Removal of these treatments reversed the effects. CONCLUSIONS: The success of CF in tracing the general path and rate of carbohydrate transport gave visual evidence that phloem transport to the ovary decreased at low Psiw or in the shade but otherwise remained functional. The decreases indicated that losses in carbohydrate delivery are central features of failed ovary development under these conditions. The selectivity of transport into the nucellus resembled the situation later when embryo and endosperm are present and selective uptake occurs from the apoplast.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Shade or inadequate water can inhibit photosynthesis and limit the development of maize (Zea mays) ovaries around the time of pollination, potentially reducing the number of kernels at harvest. This study investigated whether the decreased photosynthesis diminished only the sugar supply or also altered the transport path to the ovaries. METHODS: Photosynthesis and water potentials (Psiw) were measured in the leaves while dry matter delivery was monitored in the ovaries. Ovary glucose, starch and acid invertase activities were measured in situ. Stems were fed xylem-mobile safranin or phloem-mobile carboxyfluorescein (CF), and the dye transport to the ovaries was determined. KEY RESULTS: Under normal conditions, the ovaries gained in dry mass, and starch accumulated in the pedicel and ovary wall. Glucose accumulated in the pedicel, apparently in the apoplast where insoluble (cell-wall-bound) acid invertase acted on the arriving sucrose. A glucose gradient developed from pedicel to nucellus. Safranin moved in the xylem and did not reach the ovary, but CF moved in the phloem and arrived at the ovary. CF also spread into the pedicel but unlike glucose it did not enter the nucellus. Low Psiw or shade decreased leaf photosynthesis, ovary dry mass accumulation, invertase activities, pedicel glucose, starch accumulation and CF delivery. Removal of these treatments reversed the effects. CONCLUSIONS: The success of CF in tracing the general path and rate of carbohydrate transport gave visual evidence that phloem transport to the ovary decreased at low Psiw or in the shade but otherwise remained functional. The decreases indicated that losses in carbohydrate delivery are central features of failed ovary development under these conditions. The selectivity of transport into the nucellus resembled the situation later when embryo and endosperm are present and selective uptake occurs from the apoplast.
Authors: Zhao Su; Xuan Ma; Huihong Guo; Noor Liyana Sukiran; Bin Guo; Sarah M Assmann; Hong Ma Journal: Plant Cell Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 11.277
Authors: Helen X Wang; Ravisha R Weerasinghe; Tony D Perdue; Nihal G Cakmakci; J Philip Taylor; William F Marzluff; Alan M Jones Journal: Mol Biol Cell Date: 2006-07-19 Impact factor: 4.138
Authors: Jirong Huang; J Philip Taylor; Jin-Gui Chen; Joachim F Uhrig; Danny J Schnell; Tsuyoshi Nakagawa; Kenneth L Korth; Alan M Jones Journal: Plant Cell Date: 2006-03-31 Impact factor: 11.277
Authors: R Frank Baker; Kristen A Leach; Nathanial R Boyer; Michael J Swyers; Yoselin Benitez-Alfonso; Tara Skopelitis; Anding Luo; Anne Sylvester; David Jackson; David M Braun Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Maristela Boaceff Ciraulo; Daiene Souza Santos; Ana Claudia de Freitas Oliveira Rodrigues; Marcus Vinícius de Oliveira; Tiago Rodrigues; Regina Costa de Oliveira; Luiz R Nunes Journal: J Biomed Biotechnol Date: 2010-06-13
Authors: Krishna S V Jagadish; Polavarapu B Kavi Kishor; Rajeev N Bahuguna; Nicolaus von Wirén; Nese Sreenivasulu Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 5.753