Literature DB >> 16100174

Nasal-continuous positive airway pressure reduces pulmonary morbidity and length of hospital stay following thoracoabdominal aortic surgery.

Detlef Kindgen-Milles1, Eckhard Müller, Rolf Buhl, Hinrich Böhner, Dennis Ritter, Wilhelm Sandmann, Jörg Tarnow.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: Patients who undergo surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms have a high risk for the development of respiratory complications, which cause significant postoperative morbidity and prolong hospitalization, compared to patients who undergo other types of surgery. We studied whether prophylactic noninvasive application of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) administered via a facemask immediately after extubation may reduce pulmonary morbidity and shorten the length of hospitalization.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial.
SETTING: Surgical ICU of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Fifty-six patients following elective prosthetic replacement of the thoracoabdominal aorta, of whom 6 patients were excluded because they had received prolonged mechanical ventilation.
INTERVENTIONS: Following extubation in the ICU, nCPAP was applied for 12 to 24 h at an airway pressure of 10 cm H2O to patients in the study group (n = 25). Subjects in the control group (n = 25) received standard treatment including intermittent nCPAP (10 cm H2O for 10 min) every 4 h. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: In the study group, nCPAP was applied for a mean (+/- SD) duration of 23 +/- 3 h at an airway pressure of 10 +/- 1 cm H2O, which improved pulmonary oxygen transfer without altering hemodynamics (ie, heart rate, mean arterial BP, and central venous pressure). The application of nCPAP was associated with fewer pulmonary complications (Pa(O2)/fraction of inspired oxygen [F(IO2)] <100, atelectasis, pneumonia, reintubation rate) compared to the control group (7 of 25 patients vs 24 of 25 subjects, respectively; p = 0.019). The mean duration of intensive care treatment tended to be shorter in the study group compared to the control group (8 +/- 1 vs 12 +/- 2 days, respectively; difference not significant), while the mean length of hospital stay was shorter with nCPAP therapy (22 +/- 2 vs 34 +/- 5 days, respectively; p = 0.048).
CONCLUSIONS: The prophylactic application of nCPAP at airway pressures of 10 cm H2O significantly reduced pulmonary morbidity and length of hospital stay following the surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Thus, it can be recommended as a standard treatment procedure for this patient group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16100174     DOI: 10.1378/chest.128.2.821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  28 in total

1.  Prophylactic use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

Authors:  Rahul J Anand
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Prophylactic use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in post-thoracic surgery patients: A prospective randomized control study.

Authors:  Guangyuan Liao; Rongchang Chen; Jianxing He
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Noninvasive ventilation practice patterns for acute respiratory failure in Canadian tertiary care centres: A descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Genevieve Christina Digby; Sean P Keenan; Christopher M Parker; Tasnim Sinuff; Karen E Burns; Sangeeta Mehta; Juan J Ronco; Demetrios J Kutsogiannis; Louise Rose; Najib T Ayas; Luc R Berthiaume; Christine L D'Arsigny; Daniel E Stollery; John Muscedere
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 4.  Interventions to avoid pulmonary complications after lung cancer resection.

Authors:  Patrick James Villeneuve
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Non-invasive ventilation for surgical patients with acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Byoung Chul Lee; Kyu Hyouck Kyoung; Young Hwan Kim; Suk-Kyung Hong
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2011-06-09

Review 6.  Non-invasive ventilation in postoperative patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  D Chiumello; G Chevallard; C Gregoretti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Clinical practice guidelines for the use of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation and noninvasive continuous positive airway pressure in the acute care setting.

Authors:  Sean P Keenan; Tasnim Sinuff; Karen E A Burns; John Muscedere; Jim Kutsogiannis; Sangeeta Mehta; Deborah J Cook; Najib Ayas; Neill K J Adhikari; Lori Hand; Damon C Scales; Rose Pagnotta; Lynda Lazosky; Graeme Rocker; Sandra Dial; Kevin Laupland; Kevin Sanders; Peter Dodek
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Comparison and Evaluation of the Effects of Administration of Postoperative Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Methods-in for a Penny, in for a Pound?

Authors:  Alastair J Glossop; Antonio M Esquinas
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2016-10-01

Review 9.  Anaesthetic considerations for pectus repair surgery.

Authors:  Chinmay Patvardhan; Guillermo Martinez
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-04-11

Review 10.  Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during the postoperative period for prevention of postoperative morbidity and mortality following major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Claire J Ireland; Timothy M Chapman; Suneeth F Mathew; G Peter Herbison; Mathew Zacharias
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.