Literature DB >> 16099711

Evaluation frameworks for nursing informatics.

Leanne M Currie1.   

Abstract

Rigorous evaluation of informatics applications in healthcare is important so that the impact of such systems can be understood. Although many quantitative methods have been employed to evaluate informatics systems, there is a growing trend to utilized qualitative methods during both the formative and summative phases of research. Several evaluation frameworks that have been proposed highlight the need for both qualitative and quantitative evaluation methods in the development and post-implementation phases of informatics systems development. Recommendations regarding the timing, type and use of qualitative methods differ for each of these frameworks. This paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of the published evaluation frameworks and enumerates the qualitative research methods in use in each of these frameworks.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16099711     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  13 in total

1.  Implementation issues for mobile-wireless infrastructure and mobile health care computing devices for a hospital ward setting.

Authors:  Liza Heslop; Stephen Weeding; Linda Dawson; Julie Fisher; Andrew Howard
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  Biomedical and Health Informatics Education - the IMIA Years.

Authors:  J Mantas
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-08-02

3.  Development of a computerized paediatric intensive care unit septic shock pathway: improving user experience.

Authors:  Lauren Shivers; Sue S Feldman; Leslie W Hayes
Journal:  Health Syst (Basingstoke)       Date:  2019-05-28

Review 4.  Evaluation in Life Cycle of Information Technology (ELICIT) framework: Supporting the innovation life cycle from business case assessment to summative evaluation.

Authors:  Polina V Kukhareva; Charlene Weir; Guilherme Del Fiol; Gregory A Aarons; Teresa Y Taft; Chelsey R Schlechter; Thomas J Reese; Rebecca L Curran; Claude Nanjo; Damian Borbolla; Catherine J Staes; Keaton L Morgan; Heidi S Kramer; Carole H Stipelman; Julie H Shakib; Michael C Flynn; Kensaku Kawamoto
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Evaluation frameworks for digital nursing technologies: analysis, assessment, and guidance. An overview of the literature.

Authors:  Tobias Krick
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2021-08-17

6.  Usability testing of an online self-management program for adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Jennifer Stinson; Patrick McGrath; Ellen Hodnett; Brian Feldman; Ciaran Duffy; Adam Huber; Lori Tucker; Ross Hetherington; Shirley Tse; Lynn Spiegel; Sarah Campillo; Navreet Gill; Meghan White
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 7.  A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies.

Authors:  Julia E W C van Gemert-Pijnen; Nicol Nijland; Maarten van Limburg; Hans C Ossebaard; Saskia M Kelders; Gunther Eysenbach; Erwin R Seydel
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Effectiveness of nursing management information systems: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mona Choi; You Lee Yang; Sun-Mi Lee
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2014-10-31

9.  Conceptual Models in Health Informatics Research: A Literature Review and Suggestions for Development.

Authors:  Kathleen Gray; Paulina Sockolow
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2016-02-24

Review 10.  Measuring the impact of a moving target: towards a dynamic framework for evaluating collaborative adaptive interactive technologies.

Authors:  Laura O'Grady; Holly Witteman; Jacqueline L Bender; Sara Urowitz; David Wiljer; Alejandro R Jadad
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.