Literature DB >> 16099702

DNA damage among thyroid cancer and multiple cancer cases, controls, and long-lived individuals.

Alice J Sigurdson1, Michael Hauptmann, Bruce H Alexander, Michele Morin Doody, Cynthia B Thomas, Jeffery P Struewing, Irene M Jones.   

Abstract

Variation in the detection, signaling, and repair of DNA damage contributes to human cancer risk. To assess capacity to modulate endogenous DNA damage among radiologic technologists who had been diagnosed with breast cancer and another malignancy (breast-other, n=42), early-onset breast cancer (early-onset, age <or=35; n=38), thyroid cancer (n=68), long-lived cancer-free individuals (hyper-normals, n=20) and cancer-free controls (n=49) we quantified DNA damage (single strand breaks and abasic sites) in untreated lymphoblastoid cell lines using the alkaline comet assay. Komet software provided comet tail length, % DNA in tail (tail DNA), comet distributed moment (CDM), and Olive tail moment (OTM) summarized as the geometric mean of 100 cells. Category cut-points (median and 75th percentile) were determined from the distribution among controls. Tail length (for >or=75% versus below the median, age-adjusted) was most consistently associated with the highest odds ratios in the breast-other, early-onset, and thyroid cancer groups (with risk increased 10-, 5- or 19-fold, respectively, with wide confidence intervals) and decreased risk among the hyper-normal group. For the other three comet measures, risk of breast-other was elevated approximately three-fold. Risk of early-onset breast cancer was mixed and risk of thyroid cancer ranged from null to a two-fold increase. The hyper-normal group showed decreased odds ratios for tail DNA and OTM, but not CDM. DNA damage, as estimated by all comet measures, was relatively unaffected by survival time, reproductive factors, and prior radiation treatment. We detected a continuum of endogenous DNA damage that was highest among cancer cases, less in controls, and suggestively lowest in hyper-normal individuals. Measuring this DNA damage phenotype may contribute to the identification of susceptible sub-groups. Our observations require replication in a prospective study with a large number of pre-diagnostic samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16099702     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  15 in total

1.  Prospective analysis of DNA damage and repair markers of lung cancer risk from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Alice J Sigurdson; Irene M Jones; Qingyi Wei; Xifeng Wu; Margaret R Spitz; Douglas A Stram; Myron D Gross; Wen-Yi Huang; Li-E Wang; Jian Gu; Cynthia B Thomas; Douglas J Reding; Richard B Hayes; Neil E Caporaso
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Cell phone use and risk of thyroid cancer: a population-based case-control study in Connecticut.

Authors:  Jiajun Luo; Nicole C Deziel; Huang Huang; Yingtai Chen; Xin Ni; Shuangge Ma; Robert Udelsman; Yawei Zhang
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  The level of DNA damage in mouse hematopoietic cells and in frog and human blood cells, as induced by the action of reactive oxygen species in vitro.

Authors:  Nikolay Sirota; Elena Kuznetsova; Irina Mitroshina
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 4.  Variation in base excision repair capacity.

Authors:  David M Wilson; Daemyung Kim; Brian R Berquist; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Genetic Alterations in Pesticide Exposed Bolivian Farmers: An evaluation by analysis of chromosomal aberrations and the comet assay.

Authors:  Erik Jørs; Ana Rosa Gonzáles; Maria Eugenia Ascarrunz; Noemi Tirado; Catharina Takahashi; Erika Lafuente; Raquel A Dos Santos; Natalia Bailon; Rafael Cervantes; Huici O; Jesper Bælum; Flemming Lander
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2007-11-12

6.  Variants in the ATM-CHEK2-BRCA1 axis determine genetic predisposition and clinical presentation of papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Anna Wójcicka; Małgorzata Czetwertyńska; Michał Świerniak; Joanna Długosińska; Monika Maciąg; Agnieszka Czajka; Kinga Dymecka; Anna Kubiak; Adam Kot; Rafał Płoski; Albert de la Chapelle; Krystian Jażdżewski
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Recreational physical activity and risk of papillary thyroid cancer among women in the California Teachers Study.

Authors:  Stephanie Whisnant Cash; Huiyan Ma; Pamela L Horn-Ross; Peggy Reynolds; Alison J Canchola; Jane Sullivan-Halley; Shirley A A Beresford; Marian L Neuhouser; Thomas L Vaughan; Patrick J Heagerty; Leslie Bernstein
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Endogenous DNA damage and testicular germ cell tumors.

Authors:  M B Cook; A J Sigurdson; I M Jones; C B Thomas; B I Graubard; L Korde; M H Greene; K A McGlynn
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2008-07-24

9.  No evidence for differences in DNA damage assessed before and after a cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Parveen Bhatti; Alice J Sigurdson; Cynthia B Thomas; Allison Iwan; Bruce H Alexander; Diane Kampa; Laura Bowen; Michele Morin Doody; Irene M Jones
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Spontaneous and radiation-induced chromosomal instability and persistence of chromosome aberrations after radiotherapy in lymphocytes from prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Andrea Hille; Hana Hofman-Hüther; Elna Kühnle; Barbara Wilken; Margret Rave-Fränk; Heinz Schmidberger; Patricia Virsik
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.