Literature DB >> 16099369

The control of memory retrieval: insights from event-related potentials.

Markus Werkle-Bergner1, Axel Mecklinger, Jutta Kray, Patric Meyer, Emrah Düzel.   

Abstract

Effective performance on episodic retrieval tasks requires the ability to flexibly adapt to changing retrieval demands ('retrieval orientations'; [M.D. Rugg, E.L. Wilding, Retrieval processing and episodic memory, Trends Cogn. Sci. 4 (2000) 108-115]). We used event-related potentials (ERP) to examine whether maintaining a specific retrieval orientation and changing flexibly between different retrieval demands are mediated by the same brain systems or whether dissociable aspects of cognitive control are involved. Sixteen participants performed two recognition memory tasks. One required mere old/new decisions for words (general task), whereas the other task required the additional retrieval of each word's study font typeface (specific task). Furthermore, the participants either were asked to perform the same task continuously or to switch between the two tasks after every second test word. ERPs elicited by correctly rejected new (unstudied) words were analyzed. This enabled us to examine the ERP correlates of having adapted and maintained a task instruction as required during continuous blocks and of flexibly changing between retrieval demands during alternating blocks. The ERP analysis revealed more positive-going ERP slow waves for alternating blocks than for continuous blocks over bilateral frontal recording sites. This effect started around 250 ms after the test word and extended for several hundred milliseconds. As it was present for trials requiring a switch to the other task or to stay on the same task between 500 and 750 ms and no differences between the latter two trial types were obtained, it can be assumed that it is more related to general coordination requirements in alternating blocks, rather than to the actual control required to switch the retrieval task set. In addition, contrasting ERPs for the two task types revealed more positive-going ERP slow waves in the specific task than in the general task in the continuous blocks at lateral frontal recording sites between 250 and 700 ms. Together, these findings suggest that there are electrophysiologically dissociable aspects of cognitive control, namely for adapting and maintaining a retrieval orientation and for flexibly changing between varying retrieval demands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16099369     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  14 in total

1.  Monetary rewards influence retrieval orientations.

Authors:  Teresa M Halsband; Nicola K Ferdinand; Emma K Bridger; Axel Mecklinger
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  The role of retrieval mode and retrieval orientation in retrieval practice: insights from comparing recognition memory testing formats and restudying.

Authors:  Chuanji Gao; Timm Rosburg; Mingzhu Hou; Bingbing Li; Xin Xiao; Chunyan Guo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Feedback timing modulates interactions between feedback processing and memory encoding: Evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Gerrit Höltje; Axel Mecklinger
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Left posterior parietal cortex participates in both task preparation and episodic retrieval.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Phillips; Katerina Velanova; David A Wolk; Mark E Wheeler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Dissociable correlates of two classes of retrieval processing in prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Charan Ranganath; Aaron S Heller; Edward L Wilding
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Genetic variation in the serotonin transporter gene influences ERP old/new effects during recognition memory.

Authors:  Robert S Ross; Paolo Medrano; Kaitlin Boyle; Andrew Smolen; Tim Curran; Erika Nyhus
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Decreased fronto-temporal interaction during fixation after memory retrieval.

Authors:  Masaki Katsura; Satoshi Hirose; Hiroki Sasaki; Harushi Mori; Akira Kunimatsu; Kuni Ohtomo; Koji Jimura; Seiki Konishi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Electrophysiological evidence for flexible goal-directed cue processing during episodic retrieval.

Authors:  Jane E Herron; Lisa H Evans; Edward L Wilding
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  On the Antecedents of an Electrophysiological Signature of Retrieval Mode.

Authors:  Angharad N Williams; Lisa H Evans; Jane E Herron; Edward L Wilding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  MAO-A Phenotype Effects Response Sensitivity and the Parietal Old/New Effect during Recognition Memory.

Authors:  Robert S Ross; Andrew Smolen; Tim Curran; Erika Nyhus
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.