Literature DB >> 16099357

On the role of attention for the processing of emotions in speech: sex differences revisited.

Annett Schirmer1, Sonja A Kotz, Angela D Friederici.   

Abstract

In a previous cross-modal priming study [A. Schirmer, A.S. Kotz, A.D. Friederici, Sex differentiates the role of emotional prosody during word processing, Cogn. Brain Res. 14 (2002) 228-233.], we found that women integrated emotional prosody and word valence earlier than men. Both sexes showed a smaller N400 in the event-related potential to emotional words when these words were preceded by a sentence with congruous compared to incongruous emotional prosody. However, women showed this effect with a 200-ms interval between prime sentence and target word whereas men showed the effect with a 750-ms interval. The present study was designed to determine whether these sex differences prevail when attention is directed towards the emotional content of prosody and word meaning. To this end, we presented the same prime sentences and target words as in our previous study. Sentences were spoken with happy or sad prosody and followed by a congruous or incongruous emotional word or pseudoword. The interval between sentence offset and target onset was 200 ms. In addition to performing a lexical decision, participants were asked to decide whether or not a word matched the emotional prosody of the preceding sentence. The combined lexical and congruence judgment failed to reveal differences in emotional-prosodic priming between men and women. Both sexes showed smaller N400 amplitudes to emotionally congruent compared to incongruent words. This suggests that the presence of sex differences in emotional-prosodic priming depends on whether or not participants are instructed to take emotional prosody into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16099357     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  32 in total

1.  Contextual influences of emotional speech prosody on face processing: how much is enough?

Authors:  Silke Paulmann; Marc D Pell
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Neural correlates of cross-domain affective priming.

Authors:  Qin Zhang; Xiaohua Li; Brian T Gold; Yang Jiang
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  The cognitive consequences of emotion regulation: an ERP investigation.

Authors:  C M Deveney; D A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Recognition of affective prosody in brain-damaged patients and healthy controls: a neurophysiological study using EEG and whole-head MEG.

Authors:  Boris Kotchoubey; Jochen Kaiser; Vladimir Bostanov; Werner Lutzenberger; Niels Birbaumer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Authenticity affects the recognition of emotions in speech: behavioral and fMRI evidence.

Authors:  Matthis Drolet; Ricarda I Schubotz; Julia Fischer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Neurophysiological correlates of comprehending emotional meaning in context.

Authors:  Daphne J Holt; Spencer K Lynn; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Hearing feelings: affective categorization of music and speech in alexithymia, an ERP study.

Authors:  Katharina Sophia Goerlich; Jurriaan Witteman; André Aleman; Sander Martens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prosody processing of korean language in stroke patients: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Hye-In Ju; Yong-Wook Shin; Seok-Hee Han; Jeom-Sook Kim; Hye-Young Choi; Hye-Sun Lee; Thine Yang; Joon-Ho Shin
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2013-10-29

9.  Time course of attentional bias in anxiety: emotion and gender specificity.

Authors:  Sarah M Sass; Wendy Heller; Jennifer L Stewart; Rebecca Levin Silton; J Christopher Edgar; Joscelyn E Fisher; Gregory A Miller
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Friendly drug-dealers and terrifying puppies: affective primacy can attenuate the N400 effect in emotional discourse contexts.

Authors:  Nathaniel Delaney-Busch; Gina Kuperberg
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.