Literature DB >> 16099352

Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: an event-related brain potential study.

Ray Johnson1, Jack Barnhardt, John Zhu.   

Abstract

Behavior and event-related potentials (ERP) were recorded while participants made truthful and deceptive responses about previously memorized words under three instructional conditions: consistent truthful, consistent deceptive, and random deceptive. To determine if practice affected the deception-related activity we reported previously [R. Johnson, Jr., J. Barnhardt, J. Zhu, The deceptive response: effects of response conflict and strategic monitoring on the late positive component and episodic memory-related brain activity. Biol. Psychol., 64 (2003) 217-253; R. Johnson, Jr., J. Barnhardt, J. Zhu, The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding. Neuropsychologia, 42 (2004) 878-901], participants performed two blocks of 145 trials of each condition. In the consistent truthful condition, practice benefited performance as indicated by decreased reaction time (RT) and RT variability. In addition, practice increased P300 amplitude and decreased the amplitude of a medial frontal negativity (MFN), which is believed to index the use of response-monitoring processes. However, a different pattern of results obtained in the two deception conditions. Although practice decreased RTs by almost as much as in the consistent truthful condition, the extent to which deceptive response in both conditions were slower than those in the consistent truthful condition actually increased slightly. Hence, the component of RT reflecting processing of conflicting response information did not decrease. In accord with the RT results, MFN amplitudes in the consistent deceptive and random deceptive conditions were unaffected by practice, suggesting that the amount of executive processes required to make and/or monitor deceptive responses was undiminished by practice. Although P300 amplitude increased slightly in the consistent deceptive condition, there was no change in the random deceptive condition. Thus, a major finding here is that, unlike truthful responses, the conceptually driven response conflicts underlying deceptive responses appear to be as resistant to practice-induced changes as described previously for perceptually driven response conflicts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16099352     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  23 in total

1.  The relationship between reaction time and response variability and somatosensory No-go potentials.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakata; Kiwako Sakamoto; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Somato-motor inhibitory processing in humans: evidence from neurophysiology and neuroimaging.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakata; Kiwako Sakamoto; Yukiko Honda; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 2.781

3.  The dishonest mind set in sequence.

Authors:  Anna Foerster; Robert Wirth; Wilfried Kunde; Roland Pfister
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-06-15

4.  Electrophysiological markers of working memory usage as an index for truth-based lies.

Authors:  Yu-Hui Lo; Philip Tseng
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Lyin' eyes: ocular-motor measures of reading reveal deception.

Authors:  Anne E Cook; Douglas J Hacker; Andrea K Webb; Dahvyn Osher; Sean D Kristjansson; Dan J Woltz; John C Kircher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2012-04-30

6.  The presentation order of cue and target matters in deception study.

Authors:  Guangheng Dong; Yanbo Hu; Qilin Lu; Haiyan Wu
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.759

7.  An ERP examination of the different effects of sleep deprivation on exogenously cued and endogenously cued attention.

Authors:  Logan T Trujillo; Steve Kornguth; David M Schnyer
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  Influence of age on the effects of lying on memory.

Authors:  Laura E Paige; Eric C Fields; Angela Gutchess
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  A repeated lie becomes a truth? The effect of intentional control and training on deception.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Hu; Hao Chen; Genyue Fu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-12

10.  Does the inferior frontal sulcus play a functional role in deception? A neuronavigated theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Bruno Verschuere; Teresa Schuhmann; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.