Literature DB >> 16099289

The trouble with likelihood ratios.

Jef Van den Ende, Juan Moreira, Paulin Basinga, Zeno Bisoffi.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2005        PMID： 16099289     DOI： 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67096-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN： 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Evidence based diagnosis: multiple tests with multiple responses are important.

Authors:  Ram Kumar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-09-09

2.  How reliable are the multiple comparison methods for odds ratio?

Authors:  Ayfer Ezgi Yilmaz
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 1.416

3.  Mischievous odds ratios.

Authors:  William Steinsmith
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 11.069

4.  Rational use of Xpert testing in patients with presumptive TB: clinicians should be encouraged to use the test-treat threshold.

Authors:  Tom Decroo; Aquiles R Henríquez-Trujillo; Anja De Weggheleire; Lutgarde Lynen
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 3.090
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.