Literature DB >> 16098944

Does an auditory distractor sequence affect self-paced tapping?

Bruno H Repp1.   

Abstract

This study investigated whether an auditory distractor (D) sequence affects the timing of self-paced finger tapping. To begin with, Experiment 1 replicated earlier findings by showing that, when taps are synchronized with an isochronous auditory target (T) sequence, an isochronous D sequence of different tempo and pitch systematically modulates the tap timing. The extent of the modulation depended on the relative intensity of the T and D tones, but not on their pitch distance. Experiment 2 then used a synchronization-continuation paradigm in which D sequences of different tempi were introduced only during continuation tapping. Although the D sequences rarely captured the taps completely, they did increase the tapping variability and deviations from the correct tempo. Furthermore, they eliminated the negative correlation between successive inter-tap intervals and led to intermittent phase locking when the tapping period was close to the period of the D sequence. These distractor effects occurred regardless of whether or not the taps generated auditory feedback tones. The distractor effects thus depend neither on the intention to synchronize with a T sequence nor on the simultaneous perception of two auditory sequences. Rather, they seem to reflect a basic attraction of rhythmic movement to auditory rhythms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16098944     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  28 in total

1.  Does an auditory perceptual illusion affect on-line auditory action control? The case of (de)accentuation and synchronization.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of the tapping literature.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

Review 3.  Assimilation and contrast: the two sides of specific interference between action and perception.

Authors:  Jan Zwickel; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-05-10

4.  Body movement enhances the extraction of temporal structures in auditory sequences.

Authors:  Yi-Huang Su; Ernst Pöppel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-22

5.  Intelligence and temporal accuracy of behaviour: unique and shared associations with reaction time and motor timing.

Authors:  Linus Holm; Fredrik Ullén; Guy Madison
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effects of pitch and tempo of auditory rhythms on spontaneous movement entrainment and stabilisation.

Authors:  Manuel Varlet; Rohan Williams; Peter E Keller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-16

7.  Auditory and visual information do not affect self-paced bilateral finger tapping in children with DCD.

Authors:  Renuka Roche; Anna Maria Wilms-Floet; Jane E Clark; Jill Whitall
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Single (1:1) vs. double (1:2) metronomes for the spontaneous entrainment and stabilisation of human rhythmic movements.

Authors:  Manuel Varlet; Rohan Williams; Cécile Bouvet; Peter E Keller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Evidence for multiple strategies in off-beat tapping with anisochronous stimuli.

Authors:  Jacques Launay; Roger T Dean; Freya Bailes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-08-22

10.  Spontaneous synchronized tapping to an auditory rhythm in a chimpanzee.

Authors:  Yuko Hattori; Masaki Tomonaga; Tetsuro Matsuzawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.