Literature DB >> 16098859

Comparison of transvaginal sonography with digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position in the second stage of labor.

Neriman Zahalka1, Oscar Sadan, Gustav Malinger, Marco Liberati, Mona Boaz, Marek Glezerman, Sigi Rotmensch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Precise determination of fetal head position in labor is a prerequisite for safe instrumental deliveries, and essential for the assessment of labor progress. Recent studies have cast serious doubts on the accuracy of the time-honored digital vaginal examination (DVE) in comparison to transabdominal ultrasound scans (TUS). However, transabdominal imaging is technically difficult with a deeply engaged fetal head in the second stage of labor. We examined the accuracy and time requirements of transvaginal scans (TVS) in the second stage of labor for determination of fetal head position. STUDY
DESIGN: Sixty laboring women in the second stage of labor with a deeply engaged fetal head were examined by experienced nurse midwives and senior residents. Fetal head position was recorded as "time on a 12-hour clock." Subsequently, TUS and TVS were independently performed by a skilled sonographer. Accuracy and time requirements for all 3 examinations were recorded.
RESULTS: Fetal head position could be determined in all cases by TVS, but not in 7 cases and 9 cases by DVE and TUS, respectively (P < .03; P < .008). A discrepancy of 60 degrees or more between the DVE and TUS or TVS was found in 13/60 cases (21.7%) and 14/60 cases (23.3%), respectively. A > or = 90 degrees discrepancy was found in 9/60 cases (15%) and 12/60 cases (20%), respectively (P < .02 for comparison of TUS and TVS). In 5 cases, the digital examination erroneously perceived an occiput posterior position as occiput anterior. No significant differences in fetal head position were detected between TUS and TVS, when the examination was technically feasible. The mean time (+/-SD) required for determining fetal head position was shortest for TVS (8.7 +/- 5.8 seconds) in comparison to DVE (22.7 +/- 14.6 seconds; P < .0001) or TAS (31.7 +/- 19.1 seconds; P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: Transvaginal sonography was the most successful and accurate method for determination of fetal head position in the second stage of labor, and required the least time for performance. We believe that TVS should be routinely performed in the labor room setting for the determination of fetal head position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16098859     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

Review 1.  The effectiveness of intrapartum  ultrasonography in assessing cervical dilatation, head station and position: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yaw Amo Wiafe; Bill Whitehead; Heather Venables; Emmanuel Kweku Nakua
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2016-10-06

2.  Dynamic Changes in the Myometrium during the Third Stage of Labor, Evaluated Using Two-Dimensional Ultrasound, in Women with Normal and Abnormal Third Stage of Labor and in Women with Obstetric Complications.

Authors:  Manasi Patwardhan; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Hyunyoung Ahn; Steven J Korzeniewski; Alyse Schwartz; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 3.  Maternal postures for fetal malposition in labour for improving the health of mothers and their infants.

Authors:  Jennifer A Barrowclough; Luling Lin; Bridget Kool; G Justus Hofmeyr; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-31

4.  Sonographic evaluation in the second stage of labor to improve the assessment of labor progress and its outcome.

Authors:  Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Study protocol. IDUS - Instrumental delivery & ultrasound: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery.

Authors:  Deirdre J Murphy; Gerard Burke; Alan A Montgomery; Meenakshi Ramphul
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Intrapartum ultrasound assessment of fetal spine position.

Authors:  Salvatore Gizzo; Alessandra Andrisani; Marco Noventa; Giorgia Burul; Stefania Di Gangi; Omar Anis; Emanuele Ancona; Donato D'Antona; Giovanni Battista Nardelli; Guido Ambrosini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Fetal Head Position during the First Stage of Labor: Comparison between Vaginal Examination and Transabdominal Ultrasound.

Authors:  Jyothi Shetty; Vinod Aahir; Deeksha Pandey; Prashanth Adiga; Asha Kamath
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.