Literature DB >> 16098708

Analysis of stroke patients' and carers' reading ability and the content and design of written materials: recommendations for improving written stroke information.

Tammy Hoffmann1, Kryss McKenna.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study (a) evaluated the reading ability of patients following stroke and their carers and the reading level and content and design characteristics of the written information provided to them, (b) explored the influence of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics on patients' reading ability, and (c) described an education package that provides well-designed information tailored to patients' and carers' informational needs.
METHODS: Fifty-seven patients and 12 carers were interviewed about their informational needs in an acute stroke unit. Their reading ability was assessed using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM). The written information provided to them in the acute stroke unit was analysed using the SMOG readability formula and the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM).
RESULTS: Thirteen (22.8%) patients and 5 (41.7%) carers had received written stroke information. The mean reading level of materials analysed was 11th grade while patients read at a mean of 7-8th grade. Most materials (89%) scored as only adequate in content and design. Patients with combined aphasia read significantly lower (4-6th grade) than other patients (p=0.001).
CONCLUSION: Only a small proportion of patients and carers received written materials about stroke and the readability level and content and design characteristics of most materials required improvement. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: When developing and distributing written materials about stroke, health professionals should consider the reading ability and informational needs of the recipients, and the reading level and content and design characteristics of the written materials. A computer system can be used to generate written materials tailored to the informational needs and literacy skills of patients and carers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16098708     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  19 in total

1.  Readability of patient information regarding breast cancer prevention from the Web site of the National Cancer Institute.

Authors:  Ian C Hoppe
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Sameer Badarudeen; Sanjeev Sabharwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Readability of online patient education materials from the AAOS web site.

Authors:  Sanjeev Sabharwal; Sameer Badarudeen; Shebna Unes Kunju
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Assessment of commonly available education materials in heart failure clinics.

Authors:  Kimberli Taylor-Clarke; Queen Henry-Okafor; Clare Murphy; Madeline Keyes; Russell Rothman; Andre Churchwell; George A Mensah; Douglas Sawyer; Uchechukwu K A Sampson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.083

5.  Measuring health literacy among immigrants with a phonetic primary language: a case of Korean American women.

Authors:  Hae-Ra Han; Jiyun Kim; Miyong T Kim; Kim B Kim
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2011-04

Review 6.  A systematic review of human factors and ergonomics (HFE)-based healthcare system redesign for quality of care and patient safety.

Authors:  Anping Xie; Pascale Carayon
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Readability assessment of package inserts of biological medicinal products from the European medicines agency website.

Authors:  Ma Ángeles Piñero-López; Pilar Modamio; Cecilia F Lastra; Eduardo L Mariño
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Randomised controlled trial of an education and support package for stroke patients and their carers.

Authors:  Sally Eames; Tammy Hoffmann; Linda Worrall; Stephen Read; Andrew Wong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  How accessible was information about H1N1 flu? Literacy assessments of CDC guidance documents for different audiences.

Authors:  Lisa P Lagassé; Rajiv N Rimal; Katherine C Smith; J Douglas Storey; Elizabeth Rhoades; Daniel J Barnett; Saad B Omer; Jonathan Links
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Design and development of a telerehabilitation self-management program for persons with chronic lower limb swelling and mobility limitations: preliminary evidence.

Authors:  Becky L Faett; Mary Jo Geyer; Leslie A Hoffman; David M Brienza
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2012-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.