BACKGROUND: To define the normal range, velocity and consistency of the movement of active arm elevation with humerus in neutral or in external rotation using a simplified kinematic model. METHODS: Nine normal volunteers and the non-involved side of twenty five patients with unilateral shoulder lesion participated. A 3D optoelectronic tracking system was used to register the movement of raising the arm from the normal upright position to maximal elevation in a repetitive way. Peak humeral position, range of movement, velocity of motion and consistency of cycles were analyzed. Descriptive statistics, correlation between variables and with sex, age and side are presented, including differences between performances of movement done in neutral or external rotation. FINDINGS: Data of the six variables were: maximal abduction 142 degrees [137.4-147.0], range of motion 118.1 degrees [112-124], maximal velocity 238 degrees/s [209-265]; mean velocity 113 degrees/s [96-130]; coefficient of variation of maximal angular abduction was 2.2% [1.7-2.7]; coefficient of variation of maximal velocity 8.6% [7.3-9.9]. No significant differences were observed either on side, sex or between the shoulder of normal volunteers or that of the patients with opposite shoulder lesions. Participants older than 45 years old showed only a significant slightly lower average velocity. The study confirms the weak association between dependent (biomechanical) and independent variables. INTERPRETATION: As it is described here, analysis of arm elevation has not been previously studied and shows that has a good consistency in angular position, velocity and repeatability of motion in normal conditions which permits a picture of the overall performance of the shoulder.
BACKGROUND: To define the normal range, velocity and consistency of the movement of active arm elevation with humerus in neutral or in external rotation using a simplified kinematic model. METHODS: Nine normal volunteers and the non-involved side of twenty five patients with unilateral shoulder lesion participated. A 3D optoelectronic tracking system was used to register the movement of raising the arm from the normal upright position to maximal elevation in a repetitive way. Peak humeral position, range of movement, velocity of motion and consistency of cycles were analyzed. Descriptive statistics, correlation between variables and with sex, age and side are presented, including differences between performances of movement done in neutral or external rotation. FINDINGS: Data of the six variables were: maximal abduction 142 degrees [137.4-147.0], range of motion 118.1 degrees [112-124], maximal velocity 238 degrees/s [209-265]; mean velocity 113 degrees/s [96-130]; coefficient of variation of maximal angular abduction was 2.2% [1.7-2.7]; coefficient of variation of maximal velocity 8.6% [7.3-9.9]. No significant differences were observed either on side, sex or between the shoulder of normal volunteers or that of the patients with opposite shoulder lesions. Participants older than 45 years old showed only a significant slightly lower average velocity. The study confirms the weak association between dependent (biomechanical) and independent variables. INTERPRETATION: As it is described here, analysis of arm elevation has not been previously studied and shows that has a good consistency in angular position, velocity and repeatability of motion in normal conditions which permits a picture of the overall performance of the shoulder.