Literature DB >> 16098292

Evaluation of therapy for lymphoma.

Guy Jerusalem1, Roland Hustinx, Yves Beguin, Georges Fillet.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) is the best noninvasive imaging technique for to assess response in patients suffering from lymphoma. Early response evaluation ("interim PET") after one, a few cycles, or at midtreatment can predict response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. We calculated from data of 7 studies an overall sensitivity to predict treatment failure of 79%, a specificity of 92%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 90%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 81%, and an accuracy of 85%. Although it is not yet indicated to change patient management based on residual (18)F-FDG uptake on interim scan in chemotherapy-sensitive patients, prospective studies evaluating the role of an interim PET in patient management clearly are warranted. (18)F-FDG PET also has an important prognostic role in relapsing patients after reinduction chemotherapy before high-dose chemotherapy (HCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, all chemotherapy-sensitive patients remain candidates for HCT followed by ASCT, even if (18)F-FDG PET showed residual (18)F-FDG uptake. We calculated from data of 3 studies an overestimated risk of relapse in 16% of all PET-positive patients. Some patients with residual (18)F-FDG uptake will have a good outcome after HCT followed by ASCT. (18)F-FDG PET is the imaging technique of choice for end-of-treatment evaluation. However, (18)F-FDG is not specific for tumoral tissue. Active inflammatory lesions and infectious processes can be falsely interpreted as malignant residual cells. However, a negative (18)F-FDG PET cannot exclude minimal residual disease. Consequently, it is always indicated to correlate PET findings with clinical data, other imaging modalities, and/or a biopsy. We calculated, from data of 17 studies in end-of-treatment evaluation, a sensitivity of 76%, a specificity of 94%, a PPV of 82%, a NPV 92%, and an accuracy of 89%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16098292     DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2005.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  13 in total

Review 1.  PET in lymphoma.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 2.  Recent advances in the diagnosis and therapy of Richter's syndrome.

Authors:  Ronan Swords; John Bruzzi; Francis Giles
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Multicentre assessment and monitored use of [(18)F]FDG-PET in oncology: the Spanish experience.

Authors:  Manuel Rodríguez-Garrido; Cristina Asensio-del-Barrio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  PET imaging for Treatment Response in Cancer.

Authors:  Janet F Eary
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2008-01-01

Review 5.  Use of FDG-PET to monitor response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with lymphomas.

Authors:  N George Mikhaeel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Chemotherapy response assessment in stage IV melanoma patients-comparison of 18F-FDG-PET/CT, CT, brain MRI, and tumormarker S-100B.

Authors:  Klaus Strobel; Reinhard Dummer; Hans C Steinert; Katrin Baumann Conzett; Karin Schad; Marisol Pérez Lago; Jan D Soyka; P Veit-Haibach; Burkhardt Seifert; V Kalff
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Preclinical efficacy of the c-Met inhibitor CE-355621 in a U87 MG mouse xenograft model evaluated by 18F-FDG small-animal PET.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Tseng; Keon Wook Kang; Mangal Dandekar; Shahriar Yaghoubi; Joseph H Lee; James G Christensen; Stephen Muir; Patrick W Vincent; Neil R Michaud; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Phillip H Kuo; Bruce L McClennan; Kacie Carlson; Lynn D Wilson; Richard L Edelson; Peter W Heald; Michael Girardi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT in subcutaneous panniculitis-like T cell lymphoma: disease extent and treatment response evaluation.

Authors:  Jin-Suk Kim; Young Jin Jeong; Myung-Hee Sohn; Hwan-Jeong Jeong; Seok Tae Lim; Dong Wook Kim; Jae-Yong Kwak; Chang-Yeol Yim
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 10.  PET/CT in oncology: for which tumours is it the reference standard?

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.