Literature DB >> 16098151

'Working the system'. Achieving change through partnership working: an evaluation of cancer partnership groups.

Alison Richardson1, John Sitzia, Phil Cotterell.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the characteristics and achievements of cancer partnership groups--collaborative service improvement groups formed of NHS staff and service users--in the 34 cancer networks in England, and in particular to explore the influence that such groups had on local cancer services.
DESIGN: A qualitative approach employing a structured telephone survey, face-to-face interviews and documentary analysis. PARTICIPANTS AND
SETTING: Thirty cancer networks in England with an active Partnership Group completed the telephone survey. From these 30 networks, six networks were subsequently selected from which service users and NHS professionals involved in partnership groups and NHS professionals who were non-members were recruited to take part in face-to-face interviews. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Partnership groups were established in the majority of cancer networks. Typically, these groups were at network level, been established for less than a year, met once every 2 months, and were populated with both service users and health-care professionals. Five common activities and achievements were identified: establishment of the group itself; acting as a 'reference' group for consultation; networking and representation on other groups; patient information and communication and proactive influencing. Activities progressed in scale and complexity as groups evolved. Groups had learnt the basics of change management and some identified a more sophisticated understanding of change processes in the NHS as essential for the group's motivation and survival. When gauging the impact of involvement strategies it would seem important to subscribe to broad indicators of success that include both process and outcome measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16098151      PMCID: PMC5060292          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00332.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  3 in total

1.  User involvement and the NHS reforms.

Authors:  Penny Rhodes; Andrew Nocon
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care.

Authors:  Mike J Crawford; Deborah Rutter; Catherine Manley; Timothy Weaver; Kamaldeep Bhui; Naomi Fulop; Peter Tyrer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-30

3.  Public involvement in health care.

Authors:  Dominique Florin; Jennifer Dixon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-17
  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  Exploring the influence of service user involvement on health and social care services for cancer.

Authors:  Pamela Attree; Sara Morris; Sheila Payne; Suzanne Vaughan; Susan Hinder
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Revolution or evolution: the challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world.

Authors:  Jonathan Q Tritter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Service user involvement in cancer care: the impact on service users.

Authors:  Phil Cotterell; Gwen Harlow; Carolyn Morris; Peter Beresford; Bec Hanley; Anita Sargeant; John Sitzia; Kristina Staley
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Involvement of patients or their representatives in quality management functions in EU hospitals: implementation and impact on patient-centred care strategies.

Authors:  Oliver Groene; Rosa Sunol; Niek S Klazinga; Aolin Wang; Maral Dersarkissian; Caroline A Thompson; Andrew Thompson; Onyebuchi A Arah
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  Perceptions of success of a local UK public health collaborative†.

Authors:  H J Littlecott; K R Fox; A Stathi; J L Thompson
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.483

Review 6.  Patient and carer involvement in palliative care research: An integrative qualitative evidence synthesis review.

Authors:  Eleni Chambers; Clare Gardiner; Jill Thompson; Jane Seymour
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.762

7.  Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: availability, characteristics and presentation.

Authors:  Mark McCarthy; Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo; Chris Sherlaw-Johnson; Artak Khachatryan; Michel P Coleman; Bernard Rachet
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.