Literature DB >> 16098015

An exploratory comparison of genetic counselling protocols for HNPCC predictive testing.

K Brain1, S Sivell, K Bennert, L Howell, L France, S Jordan, M T Rogers, J Gray, J Sampson.   

Abstract

Most UK genetics centres offering predictive testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) use an extended counselling protocol originally developed for Huntington's disease. Shortened counselling may be more appropriate in the context of treatable genetic conditions such as HNPCC. Twenty-six high-risk individuals were randomized to extended genetic counselling (two sessions of education and reflection held 1 month apart) or shortened genetic counselling (a single educational session) prior to HNPCC testing. Prospective questionnaires, interviews and transcripts of counselling sessions were analysed. Participants were unsure what to expect prior to genetic counselling and had already decided to undergo genetic testing. There was no evidence of psychological harm caused by shortened genetic counselling, with a high level of satisfaction with the counselling received in both groups. Reflective counselling occurred in both groups but was framed in terms of practical action and information. Participants expressed differing preferences for the level of information received. This exploratory study indicates that shortened genetic counselling may be an appropriate means of supporting decisions already made by individuals about HNPCC testing. However, participants would benefit from preparatory information to help them reflect on issues not previously considered, which can then be explored more fully as part of a tailored counselling approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16098015     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2005.00491.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  8 in total

1.  Discussions about predictive genetic testing for Lynch syndrome: the role of health professionals and families in decisions to decline.

Authors:  Anaita Kanga-Parabia; Clara Gaff; Louisa Flander; Mark Jenkins; Louise A Keogh
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Assessment of clinical practices among cancer genetic counselors.

Authors:  Deborah Wham; Thuy Vu; Gayun Chan-Smutko; Christine Kobelka; Diana Urbauer; Brandie Heald
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Preferences for genetic testing to identify hereditary colorectal cancer: perspectives of high-risk patients, community members, and clinicians.

Authors:  Judith Walsh; Millie Arora; Christina Hosenfeld; Uri Ladabaum; Miriam Kuppermann; Sara J Knight
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials to Assess Outcomes of Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Barbara A Athens; Samantha L Caldwell; Kendall L Umstead; Philip D Connors; Ethan Brenna; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Psychological Impact of TP53-Variant-Carrier Newborns and Counselling on Mothers: A Pediatric Surveillance Cohort.

Authors:  Amanda Scartezini Gozdziejewski; Clarice Wichinescki Zotti; Isabela Aparecida Moreira de Carvalho; Thairine Camargo Dos Santos; Luana Rayana de Santi Walter; Karin Rosa Persegona Ogradowski; Karin Luiza Dammski; Heloisa Komechen; Monalisa Castilho Mendes; Emanuelle Nunes de Souza; Mariana Martins Paraizo; Ivy Zortea da Silva Parise; Guilherme Augusto Parise; André Luiz Grion; Gislaine Custódio; Rosiane Guetter Mello; Bonald C Figueiredo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 6.  100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Implementation of interventions targeting the uptake of genetic testing services for breast cancer risk: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Subash Thapa; Anja Leppin; Rikke Kristensen; Mette Just Bonde; Arja R Aro
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Mapping psychosocial interventions in familial colorectal cancer: a rapid systematic review.

Authors:  Andrada Ciucă; Ramona Moldovan; Adriana Băban
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.