Literature DB >> 16097985

Comparison of three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography and diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation in the assessment of tubal patency for the investigation of subfertility.

Carina C W Chan1, Ernest H Y Ng, Oi-Shan Tang, Karen K L Chan, Pak-Chung Ho.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography, as a screening test for tubal patency for subfertile patients, is limited by the difficulty in visualizing the entire Fallopian tube owing to its tortuosity. This major disadvantage can be overcome by means of the three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography (3D-HyCoSy). The current study compared the efficacy of 3D-HyCoSy with diagnostic laparoscopy and its feasibility as a screening test for tubal patency.
METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients scheduled to have laparoscopy were recruited to undergo the 3D-HyCoSy 2 days before the scheduled laparoscopy. Echovist (Schering AG, Berlin, Germany), the ultrasound contrast medium, was injected into the uterine cavity via a Foley's catheter. The flow of the medium in the Fallopian tube was captured by using three-dimensional power Doppler mode and was stored for later analysis. The person analyzing the images, the surgeon performing the laparoscopy, and the patients were blinded to the patients' identity and the sonography findings. The sonography and the laparoscopy findings were compared. The duration for the ultrasound examination, pain score, and patient acceptability were assessed.
RESULTS: Thirty-four of 42 (81%) Fallopian tubes were assessed. The sensitivity of 3D-HyCoSy for detecting tubal patency was 100% with a specificity of 67%. The positive and negative predictive values were 89 and 100%, respectively; the concordance rate was 91%. The mean duration (+/- SD) for the 3D-HyCoSy was 13.4 +/- 5.5 min. Fifteen patients (71%) regarded the sonography examination as at least acceptable.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the feasibility of using 3D-HyCoSy as an initial investigation for tubal patency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16097985     DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00797.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  8 in total

1.  Sonohysterosalpingography: a suitable choice in infertility workup.

Authors:  Angela Graziano; Giuseppe Lo Monte; Ilaria Soave; Donatella Caserta; Massimo Moscarini; Roberto Marci
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  Comparison of sonohysterography to hysterosalpingogram for tubal patency assessment in a multicenter fertility treatment trial among women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Mindy S Christianson; Richard S Legro; Susan Jin; Esther Eisenberg; Michael P Diamond; Karl R Hansen; Wendy Vitek; Aaron K Styer; Peter Casson; Christos Coutifaris; Gregory M Christman; Ruben Alvero; Elizabeth E Puscheck; Alicia Y Christy; Fangbai Sun; Heping Zhang; Alex J Polotsky; Nanette Santoro
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Three- or four-dimensional hysterosalpingo contrast sonography for diagnosing tubal patency in infertile females: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuelong Wang; Linxue Qian
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Application of 3D-HyCoSy in the diagnosis of oviduct obstruction.

Authors:  Jinglei Wang; Jingbo Li; Ling Yu; Suhua Han; Xiaofang Shen; Xiao Jia
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Comparison of Effectiveness as well as Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Dimensions of Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography for Diagnosis of Lesions Associated with Female Infertility.

Authors:  Rudi Pei
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Technical Tips and Tricks after 10 Years of HyFoSy for Tubal Patency Testing.

Authors:  Roxana-Elena Bohîlțea; Bianca-Margareta Mihai; Cătălina-Diana Stănică; Consuela-Mădălina Gheorghe; Costin Berceanu; Vlad Dima; Alexia-Teodora Bohîlțea; Smaranda Neagu; Radu Vlădăreanu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 7.  Imaging techniques for assessment of tubal status.

Authors:  Sonal Panchal; Chaitanya Nagori
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-01

8.  Ultrasound in Infertility Setting: Optimal Strategy to Evaluate the Assessment of Tubal Patency.

Authors:  Luca Mandia; Carlo Personeni; Patrizio Antonazzo; Salvatore Alessio Angileri; Antonio Pinto; Valeria Savasi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.