Literature DB >> 16097798

Ochratoxin a causes DNA damage and cytogenetic effects but no DNA adducts in rats.

Angela Mally1, Gaetano Pepe, Srivani Ravoori, Mario Fiore, Ramesh C Gupta, Wolfgang Dekant, Pasquale Mosesso.   

Abstract

Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a potent nephrotoxin and renal carcinogen in rats, but the mechanism of OTA tumorigenicity is unknown. Ochratoxin A has been shown to be negative in many genetic toxicology test in vitro. However, the potential of OTA to induce genotoxic effects has not been investigated in male rats, the most sensitive species for OTA-induced tumor formation. In this study, male F344 rats were repeatedly administered OTA (0, 250, 500, 1000, and 2000 microg/kg of body wt) or the non-chlorinated analogue ochratoxin B (OTB; 2000 microg/kg of body wt) for 2 weeks (5 days/week), and DNA breakage was analyzed in target and nontarget tissues using the comet assay both in the absence and presence of formamidopyrimidine-DNA (Fpg) glycosylase. Potential DNA-adduct formation was also analyzed in the target organ kidney by 32P-postlabeling using two different solvent systems. DNA-strand breaks were evident in liver, kidney, and spleen of animals treated with OTA, and a similar degree of DNA damage was observed in rats treated with OTB, despite the lower toxicity of OTB. Moreover, the presence of DNA damage did not correlate with histopathological alterations, which were evident in the kidney but not in the liver. In liver and kidney, the extent of DNA damage was further enhanced in the presence of Fpg glycosylase, which is known to convert oxidative DNA damage into strand breaks, suggesting the presence of oxidative DNA damage. Oxidative DNA damage as a mechanism of OTA-dependent DNA damage is consistent with the absence of lipophilic DNA adducts as assessed by 32P-postlabeling analysis. No spots indicative of OTA-related DNA adducts were observed in kidney DNA extracted from OTA-treated animals by 32P-postlabeling analysis, despite the use of synthetic standard for postulated adducts. A small, but not significant, increase in the incidence of chromosomal aberrations (essentially chromatid and chromosome-type deletions) was observed in splenocytes from rats treated with OTA in vivo and subsequently cultured in vitro to express chromosomal damage. These aberrations are also compatible with oxidative DNA lesions since they are not typically caused by chemical carcinogens which form covalent DNA adducts. Together, with the lack of evidence for formation of lipophilic DNA adducts as assessed by postlabeling, these data suggest that OTA may cause genetic damage in both target and nontarget tissues independent of direct covalent binding to DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16097798     DOI: 10.1021/tx049650x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  25 in total

1.  Induction of micronuclei by ochratoxin A is a sensitive parameter of its genotoxicity in cultured cells.

Authors:  W Föllmann; C Behm; G H Degen
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.833

2.  Mycotoxins as human carcinogens-the IARC Monographs classification.

Authors:  Vladimir Ostry; Frantisek Malir; Jakub Toman; Yann Grosse
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.833

3.  Perturbation of mitosis through inhibition of histone acetyltransferases: the key to ochratoxin a toxicity and carcinogenicity?

Authors:  Kristin Czakai; Katja Müller; Pasquale Mosesso; Gaetano Pepe; Markus Schulze; Antje Gohla; Debasis Patnaik; Wolfgang Dekant; Jonathan M G Higgins; Angela Mally
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Ochratoxin A-induced mutagenesis in mammalian cells is consistent with the production of oxidative stress.

Authors:  Nieves Palma; Serena Cinelli; Orazio Sapora; Samuel H Wilson; Eugenia Dogliotti
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 5.  Comet assay: a versatile but complex tool in genotoxicity testing.

Authors:  Eugenia Cordelli; Margherita Bignami; Francesca Pacchierotti
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.524

6.  Implications of global climate change for the assessment and management of human health risks of chemicals in the natural environment.

Authors:  John M Balbus; Alistair B A Boxall; Richard A Fenske; Thomas E McKone; Lauren Zeise
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.742

7.  Evidence for a role of oxidative stress in the carcinogenicity of ochratoxin a.

Authors:  M Marin-Kuan; V Ehrlich; T Delatour; C Cavin; B Schilter
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2011-06-22

8.  A pilot study of nuclear instability in archived renal and upper urinary tract tumours with putative ochratoxin aetiology.

Authors:  Peter G Mantle; Cyrille Amerasinghe; Amy L Brown; Diana Herman; Thomas Horn; Thoger Krogh; Edward W Odell; Tomas Rosenbaum; Calin A Tatu
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 4.546

9.  Health risk assessment of ochratoxin A for all age-sex strata in a market economy.

Authors:  T Kuiper-Goodman; C Hilts; S M Billiard; Y Kiparissis; I D K Richard; S Hayward
Journal:  Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess       Date:  2010-02

10.  Topical application of ochratoxin A causes DNA damage and tumor initiation in mouse skin.

Authors:  Rahul Kumar; Kausar M Ansari; Bhushan P Chaudhari; Alok Dhawan; Premendra D Dwivedi; Swatantra K Jain; Mukul Das
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.