Literature DB >> 1609748

Measurement of resistant starch: factors affecting the amount of starch escaping digestion in vitro.

J G Muir1, K O'Dea.   

Abstract

We developed an in vitro assay system that mimics the physiological conditions for starch digestion. In this system all undigested starch was termed resistant starch (RS). The richest sources of RS were firm bananas and roasted chickpeas. Different food-processing techniques produced different amounts of RS. RS in uncooked oats (0.161 g/g dry wt) and firm bananas (0.247 g/g dry wt) was reduced by cooking to 0.028 and 0.032 g/g dry wt, respectively. Cooling boiled potato overnight at 4 degrees C produced a 2.8-fold increase in the amounts of RS. Whole rice contained more RS than did ground rice whereas grinding did not affect amounts of RS in roasted chickpeas. Amounts of RS in food decreased with increased chewing, indicating that chewing can also affect the amount of starch escaping digestion. This assay may be useful in predicting which foods and processing techniques result in high amounts of starch escaping digestion in the small intestine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1609748     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/56.1.123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  16 in total

1.  Organoleptic and glycemic properties of chickpea-wheat composite breads.

Authors:  Tasleem A Zafar; Fatima Al-Hassawi; Fatima Al-Khulaifi; Ghanima Al-Rayyes; Carol Waslien; Fatma G Huffman
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  In vitro utilization of amylopectin and high-amylose maize (Amylomaize) starch granules by human colonic bacteria.

Authors:  X Wang; P L Conway; I L Brown; A J Evans
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Pasting, textural and thermal properties of resistant starch prepared from potato (Solanum tuberosum) starch using pullulanase enzyme.

Authors:  Chagam Koteswara Reddy; S Pramila; Sundaramoorthy Haripriya
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.701

4.  Analysis for low-molecular-weight carbohydrates is needed to account for all energy-contributing nutrients in some feed ingredients, but physical characteristics do not predict in vitro digestibility of dry matter.

Authors:  D M D L Navarro; E M A M Bruininx; L de Jong; H H Stein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Carbohydrates, dietary fiber, and resistant starch in white vegetables: links to health outcomes.

Authors:  Joanne L Slavin
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 8.701

6.  Resistant starch content of conventionally boiled and pressure-cooked cereals, legumes and tubers.

Authors:  B S Yadav; A Sharma; R B Yadav
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 2.701

7.  Processing and storage of Indian cereal and cereal products alters its resistant starch content.

Authors:  Ruchi H Vaidya; Mini K Sheth
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 2.701

8.  Enzyme-resistant fractions of beans lowered serum cholesterol and increased sterol excretions and hepatic mRNA levels in rats.

Authors:  Kyu-Ho Han; Michihiro Fukushima; Teruhiko Kato; Michiyuki Kojima; Kiyoshi Ohba; Ken-ichiro Shimada; Mitsuo Sekikawa; Masuo Nakano
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.880

9.  Graded dietary resistant starch concentrations on apparent total tract macronutrient digestibility and fecal fermentative end products and microbial populations of healthy adult dogs.

Authors:  Alison N Beloshapka; Tzu-Wen L Cross; Kelly S Swanson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Unexpected high digestion rate of cooked starch by the Ct-maltase-glucoamylase small intestine mucosal α-glucosidase subunit.

Authors:  Amy Hui-Mei Lin; Buford L Nichols; Roberto Quezada-Calvillo; Stephen E Avery; Lyann Sim; David R Rose; Hassan Y Naim; Bruce R Hamaker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.