Literature DB >> 16097237

Cephalometric evaluation of nongrowing females with skeletal and dental Class II, division 1 malocclusion.

M Ozgür Sayin1, Hakan Türkkahraman.   

Abstract

Studies evaluating maxillary and mandibular skeletal and dental positions and the vertical components of Class II patients have reported conflicting results. In addition, no common results have been found regarding cranial base configurations. However, few studies have evaluated nongrowing subjects. The aim of this study was to establish whether patients with skeletal and dental Class II division 1 malocclusion have specific craniofacial features. For this, 40 nongrowing females were evaluated cephalometrically. Wide variations were observed for almost all measurements of Class II division 1 patients. However, a posteriorly positioned and rotated mandible, protrusive mandibular incisors, and an increased cranial base angle were all mean characteristics of Class II division 1 patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16097237     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[656:CEONFW]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  12 in total

1.  Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 malocclusion in a Saudi population living in the western region.

Authors:  Ali H Hassan
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2010-11-02

2.  Craniofacial characteristics of Syrian adolescents with Class II division 1 malocclusion: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Alaa Al Ayoubi; Daniel Dalla Torre; Melinda Madléna
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Phenotypic diversity in white adults with moderate to severe Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Lina M Moreno Uribe; Sara C Howe; Colleen Kummet; Kaci C Vela; Deborah V Dawson; Thomas E Southard
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  The relationship between vertical facial morphology and overjet in untreated Class II subjects.

Authors:  Humam Saltaji; Carlos Flores-Mir; Paul W Major; Mohamed Youssef
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Twin Block appliance in subjects with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion amongst different cervical vertebral maturation stages.

Authors:  Aisha Khoja; Mubassar Fida; Attiya Shaikh
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016-06

6.  Factors influencing orthodontic treatment time for non-surgical Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Lívia Monteiro Bichara; Mônica Lídia Castro de Aragón; Gustavo Antônio Martins Brandão; David Normando
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Relationship between cephalometric cranial base and anterior-posterior features in an Iranian population.

Authors:  Mohammad Monirifard; Saeid Sadeghian; Zahra Afshari; Elahe Rafiei; Asana Vali Sichani
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-01-21

8.  Dentoskeletal and tooth-size differences between Syrian and Hungarian adolescents with Class II division 1 malocclusion: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Alaa Al Ayoubi; Alireza Khandan Dezfully; Melinda Madléna
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2020-06-03

Review 9.  Substantial Improvements in Facial Morphology through Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Luminița Ligia Vaida; Bianca Maria Negruțiu; Irina Nicoleta Zetu; Abel Emanuel Moca; Simion Bran
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 2.948

10.  Relationship between skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions with vertical skeletal pattern.

Authors:  Sonia Patricia Plaza; Andreina Reimpell; Jaime Silva; Diana Montoya
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2019-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.